IIRC, the Spidervalve is a bit of a different beast from the other Spiders, since it's not really a modelling amp but rather a tube amp that has some onboard digital effects you can put in the loop if you want.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How long have the spiders not sounded like complete garbage?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cynical View PostIIRC, the Spidervalve is a bit of a different beast from the other Spiders, since it's not really a modelling amp but rather a tube amp that has some onboard digital effects you can put in the loop if you want.
Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cynical View PostOddly, I've always felt that cleans were the strongest part of the Spider line; very clear and clean, maybe "sterile" but they get the job done just fine. Barely overdriven is still the weakest part of the line, though, I agree on that (but it's still a LOT better than the III or IV, and really probably better than the cheap solid-state practice amps that made the non-Spider bottom-of-the-line when I started learning ~15 years ago).
The speaker was always the biggest problem, though. The Spider heads into a decent cab weren't anywhere near as awful as the cheap combos, but obviously no-one who is serious enough for a big head + cab setup is going to get a Spider head, so the point was kind of moot.Administrator of the SDUGF
Comment
-
Good thoughts here, I only tried the spider with high gain so cant comment om the cleans. Reading about the Spidervalve makes me a little nostalgic for those things. I remember playing those and the vypyr tubes back when they came out and believing theybwere the future of modeling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gtrjunior View PostA buddy of mine has a Blackstar ID Core 100W something-or-other.
I thought it sounded pretty decent.
It had a selection of 6 different preamp "settings";
but I found that the clean's wouldn't breakup,
the breakup wouldn't clean up
And the high gain was.... very high gain and great for metal.
I really liked the onboard stereo reverb, four different settings- far superior to the onboard reverb on my HT-20 :o
Never tried a Spider though.
\m/If somethings important- send a PM. I might be offline for long periods. Rock on!!!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Erlend_G View Post
I had one of the smaller ID:Core ones, I think 2x20 watts...
It had a selection of 6 different preamp "settings";
but I found that the clean's wouldn't breakup,
the breakup wouldn't clean up
And the high gain was.... very high gain and great for metal.
I really liked the onboard stereo reverb, four different settings- far superior to the onboard reverb on my HT-20 :o
Never tried a Spider though.
\m/
But for my friend who is a beginner, it works for him. It’s a much better setup than I had when I first started.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jimman View PostGood thoughts here, I only tried the spider with high gain so cant comment om the cleans. Reading about the Spidervalve makes me a little nostalgic for those things. I remember playing those and the vypyr tubes back when they came out and believing theybwere the future of modeling.Administrator of the SDUGF
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gtrjunior View Post
Yeah, you’re right. Now that you mention it the cleans don’t break up and the amp itself isn’t that versatile.
But for my friend who is a beginner, it works for him. It’s a much better setup than I had when I first started.
I've been playing for 20 years; so I¨m maybe very picky about ...well, what makes a tube amp great.
I'd love the ID:Core myself, if I was 13 years old again .
\m/If somethings important- send a PM. I might be offline for long periods. Rock on!!!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mincer View Post
I think your experience is common, as most people who buy the amp are only interested in high gain. It actually does that well, if not dynamically. I'd be happy with it if that is what I used.
Comment
-
The Katana and Peavey's VIP series are much better alternatives at that price point than Line 6. Line 6 does do some things right (M-series effects, HX Effects, DL4 delay) but you have to spend some money. That sound doesn't 'trickle down' at all.Administrator of the SDUGF
Comment
-
The only amps that L6 made that were awesome were the flextone vetta & DT series. The spider series was meant for beginners & sounded boring to say the least.
Those days tech21 had the trademark series of amps I believe which were also good. Then came the Peavey Vypry Tube series & Fender Mustangs which were way better beginner amps because they sounded great.
Nowadays there's much wider choice of beginner gear available that's affordable & sounds inspiring.
Last edited by Hank-; 08-27-2020, 06:06 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hank- View PostThe only amps that L6 made that were awesome were the flextone vetta & DT series. The spider series was meant for beginners & sounded boring to say the least.
Those days tech21 had the trademark series of amps I believe which were also good. Then came the Peavey Vypry Tube series & Fender Mustangs which were way better beginner amps because they sounded great.
Nowadays there's much wider choice of beginner gear available that's affordable & sounds inspiring.Administrator of the SDUGF
Comment
Comment