You guys buying Deans all this recent time were helping little Jr avoid fulfilling his original dreams of becoming a DJ or Influencer, but he had to keep up that appearance of daddy'd burgeoning young entrepreneur in order to keep daddy's money coming in.
At least now he can go forth and fulfill his dreams.
He's free!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gibson v Dean trial to start
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by beaubrummels View PostThat's gettin it done. Mom's in charge.
Leave a comment:
-
If this was at Gibson, it wouldn't even make the news. $420,000 is what 3 maybe 4 custom shop Les Pauls?
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
WTH????? There are other companies making V's. Gibson must have something against Dean.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Now Gibson can funnel all of the super-stratish designs to Kramer, which they now own.
Leave a comment:
-
My dad was an Epiphone dealer in the 90s and I still have what started life as a T310. There may have been a manic episode and chop saw involved.
From what I remember, this thing new was well below the quality of Glarry type $100i-$150ish guitars you can buy now.Last edited by piblock; 06-12-2022, 07:54 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mincer View PostYes, they were very cheap, badly set up guitars at the time.
Originally posted by ICTGoober View PostThey had very little redeeming value. Plywood bodies, as I recall - horrid electronics, neck was no fun at all, hardware was crap.
I do find it hypocritical of Gibson to sue other companies for things they do themselves...but that is business. Kinda like I'm sure most of the people on this forum would want DiMarzio to not enforce the double cream trademark but business is business.
Leave a comment:
-
They had very little redeeming value. Plywood bodies, as I recall - horrid electronics, neck was no fun at all, hardware was crap.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: