banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is responsible for the proliferation of flame/quilt/burl tops/veneers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who is responsible for the proliferation of flame/quilt/burl tops/veneers?

    In the 80s, I believe the only mainstream guitars with flame maple tops were Gibson USA. I think strats could be had in tobacco and cherry burst. All the super strats and metal guitars afair, were solid, pearl, or graphic finishes.

    Somewhere along the way, other companies started putting decorative tops on super strats and other shapes. I know some of my 90s Ibbys had flame and burl tops, but they deleted the body binding, and I believe they weren't real tops, just veneers.

    About a decade ago, even cheap chinese guitars had decorative tops. And in response, companies like Fender/Charvel began flooding the market with solid retro-inspired super strats. Which honestly I like.

    I feel that because decorative tops are used on cheaps imports, the whole concept has been cheapened. It used to be associated with higher end guitars. I do like the "unique" aspect of it. Burl top guitars especially have very unique identity, like a fingerprint.

    Now I think we are in a "post veneer" period where probably other people have gotten sick of them and instead want tried and true solid finishes.

    Would anyone care to speculate about the evolution of guitar finishes over the past 40 years? Was it being driven by a boutique builder like Suhr, and the big factories were just making cheap copies? Or is Ibanez responsible for this?



  • #2
    Nah, look at a 1983 Ibanez catalog. Full of figured maple, e.g.



    And PRS did the flame thing from the beginning.

    Comment


    • #3
      It’s a conspiracy by a tightly concealed cabal to tempt us into sin. The flamed tops represent hell, where we’re going for playing such instruments.

      Strat has 2 horns and 3 pickups with 6, 6 and 6 pole pieces.

      COINCIDENCE?
      The opinions expressed above do not necessarily represent those of the poster and are to be considered suspect at best.

      Lead guitarist and vocalist of...



      Keep up to date on our Facebook

      Comment


      • #4
        The only thing I care about, is how it looks. I don't really care how they got there. "Paint", after all, is not a natural finish. About a decade or so ago, I learned what a "photo-top" is. I think it's a fairly clever finish technique. I have one that you couldn't tell from real wood.

        On the other hand, I wouldn't want to pay a premium price for a "fake" finish.

        Comment


        • #5
          In the 80s, I believe the only mainstream guitars with flame maple tops were Gibson USA.
          You'd be wrong. Ask someone who was around in the 60's and 70's. Or do some studying on guitars built before you were born.

          When you get right down to it, veneers and faux finishes have been used in instrument making and furniture making for over a hundred years. So what are you complaining about? You feel cheated, or something? The market determines demand, the makers provide as long as a source is available. That's all.

          aka Chris Pile, formerly of Six String Fever

          Comment


          • #6
            I'd much rather a figured top than just a solid color. Especially the horrid "hair metal" neons.

            Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk

            Comment


            • #7
              Why would I go back to solid colors when figured tops are so much prettier, on average? It's a good time to be buying guitars.

              Comment


              • #8
                Photo finish. Been around since the 90's

                Comment


                • #9
                  I definitely fall into the group of people that are "over" highly figured tops. They really don't do anything for me

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by chadd View Post
                    I definitely fall into the group of people that are "over" highly figured tops. They really don't do anything for me
                    Exactly. You get it. The details are not anything that can be appreciated beyond five feet anyway. And figured tops generally don't pop as much as solid colors or graphics. If they were rare and exclusive, maybe, but all the Harley be tons have then now. Its like a signal its an Asian import.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In the 70s, the only commonly seen flametops were jazz boxes and a scant handful among the old Les Pauls.
                      Everyone dreamed of having a guitar with a nice curly maple top.
                      I remember being over the moon when I got my first with nice flame; it was a '74 L5-S.
                      It had a flame maple neck too, something even the the legendary bursts didn't have.

                      Now that there's flame everywhere, I agree that its cachet has completely evaporated.
                      Today it's found on many low budget guitars too, so it isn't a sign of quality anymore.

                      However even without the snob appeal, IMO it's an aesthetically pleasing look.
                      And some of the tops out there are just insane, especially on PRSi and premium Gibsons.
                      Much nicer than any of the old bursts, which were made when the standards for flame were not very high.
                      .
                      "You should know better by now than to introduce science into a discussion of voodoo."
                      .

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        As a side anecdote, I now have my grandfather's RCA radio from the 1940's that is this beautiful free-standing wood cabinet with multiple burled and flame woods in a violin burst everywhere. When I went to pick it up, I was expecting this heavy monster that required 2 people to move, but I could pick it up by myself and almost accidentally threw it. Turns out, when I looked behind it, the thing is actually just a simple plywood box and all the fancy woods are very thin veneers. (My family wasn't rich and this was just a cheap radio back in the day, but just looked nice for the time.). So the idea of veneers to make anything wood seem fancier has been going on for a long long time.

                        In the 80's into the 90's I recall the 'famous' or 'classic' bursts weren't as popular and so harder to find, but they were around. I recall seeing weirder variants like pink and bubble gum blue flame bursts. Whether they were a solid top, veneer, or photo top is a matter of price point, so you have to do your homework to make sure the price point matches what it is. (Taking the pickups out and looking at the cross-section of the top is one of the ways I know to check.)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yeah, we started to see different ways companies could offer figured tops (photos, very thin slices of wood) in mass produced guitars in the 90s. Things like that used to be a custom order from most companies. Now almost every company offers some sort of figuring somewhere in their line. I like most of them, unless they look like diseases under a microscope, or if it is all way too busy.
                          Administrator of the SDUGF

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Both Carvin and Hamer back in the 80's were building guitars with solid figured bodies. Not Figured tops but solid figured bodies and necks. Had a Hamer Vintage S that was solid quilt maple as an example. Some of the highly figured Carvins in both flame and quilt maple plus highly figured KOA were absolutely stunning many with equally highly figured necks. My early to mid 90's Washburn USA guitars with quilt drop tops are absolutely jaw dropping in the flesh and no photo does them justice. Had a late 70's flame Green Burst X shaped Aria U 60 Deluxe that was also a real looker and one of the best guitars I ever owned. Gibson was the first I remember seeing seeing but a lot of others had figured top and bodies in the late 70's.
                            Guitars
                            Kiesel DC 135, Carvin AE 185, DC 400, DC 127 KOA, DC 127 Quilt Purple, X220C, PRS Custom 24, Washburn USA MG 122 proto , MG 102, MG 120.
                            Amps PRS Archon 50 head, MT 15, Mesa Subway Rocket, DC-5, Carvin X50B Hot Rod Mod head, Zinky 25watt Blue Velvet combo.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Mincer View Post
                              Yeah, we started to see different ways companies could offer figured tops (photos, very thin slices of wood) in mass produced guitars in the 90s. Things like that used to be a custom order from most companies. Now almost every company offers some sort of figuring somewhere in their line. I like most of them, unless they look like diseases under a microscope, or if it is all way too busy.
                              Agree with this as love a nice tasteful figured top. However now days many companies are building with woods and colors that look like an alien puked all over the top. Kiesel is one of the worst at this and charges absolutely crazy prices for their alien puke tops . Like this one and I am NOT a fan LOL! https://reverb.com/item/58421791-kie...e-yellow-burst
                              Guitars
                              Kiesel DC 135, Carvin AE 185, DC 400, DC 127 KOA, DC 127 Quilt Purple, X220C, PRS Custom 24, Washburn USA MG 122 proto , MG 102, MG 120.
                              Amps PRS Archon 50 head, MT 15, Mesa Subway Rocket, DC-5, Carvin X50B Hot Rod Mod head, Zinky 25watt Blue Velvet combo.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X