In the 80s, I believe the only mainstream guitars with flame maple tops were Gibson USA. I think strats could be had in tobacco and cherry burst. All the super strats and metal guitars afair, were solid, pearl, or graphic finishes.
Somewhere along the way, other companies started putting decorative tops on super strats and other shapes. I know some of my 90s Ibbys had flame and burl tops, but they deleted the body binding, and I believe they weren't real tops, just veneers.
About a decade ago, even cheap chinese guitars had decorative tops. And in response, companies like Fender/Charvel began flooding the market with solid retro-inspired super strats. Which honestly I like.
I feel that because decorative tops are used on cheaps imports, the whole concept has been cheapened. It used to be associated with higher end guitars. I do like the "unique" aspect of it. Burl top guitars especially have very unique identity, like a fingerprint.
Now I think we are in a "post veneer" period where probably other people have gotten sick of them and instead want tried and true solid finishes.
Would anyone care to speculate about the evolution of guitar finishes over the past 40 years? Was it being driven by a boutique builder like Suhr, and the big factories were just making cheap copies? Or is Ibanez responsible for this?
Somewhere along the way, other companies started putting decorative tops on super strats and other shapes. I know some of my 90s Ibbys had flame and burl tops, but they deleted the body binding, and I believe they weren't real tops, just veneers.
About a decade ago, even cheap chinese guitars had decorative tops. And in response, companies like Fender/Charvel began flooding the market with solid retro-inspired super strats. Which honestly I like.
I feel that because decorative tops are used on cheaps imports, the whole concept has been cheapened. It used to be associated with higher end guitars. I do like the "unique" aspect of it. Burl top guitars especially have very unique identity, like a fingerprint.
Now I think we are in a "post veneer" period where probably other people have gotten sick of them and instead want tried and true solid finishes.
Would anyone care to speculate about the evolution of guitar finishes over the past 40 years? Was it being driven by a boutique builder like Suhr, and the big factories were just making cheap copies? Or is Ibanez responsible for this?
Comment