Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
As I said previously, I was quite satisfied with the rhythm tone of the 59 in bridge, I was just missing a little bit in the lead department. I'm hoping that the JB rolled back will give me something similar (and clear) to the 59 for rhythm and that leads will be a no brainer. If it's too much, maybe the C-5 is the answer, i.e., a slightly more aggressive 59.
As for the neck, I find the 59 too bassy and unusable as a rhythm pick-up with my rig (and taste) and it does sound as though the jazz would give me the top end and vintage clean I'm looking for on my Marshall). I'll try to figure out the bridge first, though.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Collapse
X
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
I have an Angus Young pup, it's not too much different than a stock Gibson pup. I would definitely go Duncan on this one. And, like Lew said, just try to get the sound you like BEST, otherwise you'll be on a perpetual quest for "the tone". I used to get a lot of high output pickups because all my guitar heroes used them. It was a LONG time before I realized MY tone was in low to medium output pickups. Sometimes you just gotta put aside what everyone else thinks is good and go out on a limb to get what you want (look at me, I'm a DiMarzio fiend! ).
Hope everything works out!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Originally posted by LewguitarGetting a Les Paul to sound like a SG is not really easy: the Les Paul has alot thicker and deeper tone.
You could try a set of Seth Lovers, Antiquities or Pearly Gates.
EDIT - One other thing.........
It could just be the volume. Angus and Malcolm play LOUD without attenuation. That in itself is going to give them a BIG cutting tone! Angus's sustain has a lot to do with playing loud enough that the guitar is pushed to the edge of feedback. Next plan - Get some earplugs and turn that sucker up!Last edited by Simon_F; 10-04-2004, 06:04 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Originally posted by No effectsThe JB is going in for now and I'll let my ears be the judge. The Young Bros' clean tone is a big reference point for what I'm after, but it's also as "distorted" a sound as I ever want to get (i.e., our band plays rock classics from the 50's through today, as well as more blues influenced numbers). I know I'm getting closer and if the JB doesn't do it for me, I'll take advantage of SD's return policy and keep trying - C5 and Jazz are next on the list. Thanks to all
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
The JB is going in for now and I'll let my ears be the judge. The Young Bros' clean tone is a big reference point for what I'm after, but it's also as "distorted" a sound as I ever want to get (i.e., our band plays rock classics from the 50's through today, as well as more blues influenced numbers). I know I'm getting closer and if the JB doesn't do it for me, I'll take advantage of SD's return policy and keep trying - C5 and Jazz are next on the list. Thanks to all
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Originally posted by RG 2570never!
he used stock gibsons for a long time then the rio grand BBQ then this gibson, i am a big fan of his
Hmmm. I wonder who I have him mixed up with....
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
I've found that using the exact same gear (same amp, same speakers, same pickups, same guitar) as my heroes still doesn't mean I'll sound like them...we have all have our own unique touch and personality.
Sometimes using really differant gear from my heroes actually gets me closer to what I perceive as thier tone because my touch and picking attack and everything else about me is differant than say Jeff Beck or Stevie Ray or Eric Clapton or Jimi Hendrix or BB King or any of my own heroes.
But that said, Angus didn't use hot pickups for the classic recordings AC/DC are known for. Just 60's alnico 5 Gibson pickups...probably about 8.2K for both the neck and bridge pickup.
The JB, at 16.5K is way hotter. The Custom 5, Custom and Custom Custom at over 14K are also hotter. The Screamin Demon at over 10K is hotter.
And the 59B, at just over 9K, is also hotter than what Angus used....tho the 7.5K neck 59 is lower in output than the 8.2K (probably...) Gibsons he used!
I always think of the story Eddie Van Halen tells about Ted Nugent. Ted asked if he could try Eddie's gear and plugged Eddie's guitar into Eddie's old Plexi and started wailing.
EVH said he sounded just like Ted!
Touch, choice of notes and our personality and level of talent always make us sound just like us...regardless of what we're playing through.Last edited by Guest; 10-04-2004, 11:07 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
you probably want a C5/JAzz combo dude........ C5 is like a bigger sounding 59, more bass and sustain....a bit hotter
jazz will be similar to 59 neck, but less bass and better for chording
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Originally posted by screamingdaisyI could be wrong, but later on didn't Angus use a DiMarzio Super Distortion in the bridge?
he used stock gibsons for a long time then the rio grand BBQ then this gibson, i am a big fan of his
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
I could be wrong, but later on didn't Angus use a DiMarzio Super Distortion in the bridge?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Originally posted by No effectsThanks for the other replies guys. I considered the Gibson Angus signature and although it is higher output, it is also much more expensive that the SD's. I don't know the Demon, but doesn't the output seems a little low (10k)?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Thanks for the other replies guys. I considered the Gibson Angus signature and although it is higher output, it is also much more expensive that the SD's. I don't know the Demon, but doesn't the output seems a little low (10k)?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
Thanks Lew. I think part of the beauty of the non-master volume Marshalls is that you get a great lead tone by turning it up (in the base of this amp, passed 2), so turning volume down would obviously compromise this (also note that on the bridge, there is no lack of clarity whatsoever, even at higher volumes). That being said, even with my Marshall on 7, the 59b still lacks some (not much) of the sustain and rawness Angus seems to get from his rig (he uses the 100w plexis on stage and uses his bridge pup exclusively). This is why I considered a higher output pup for the bridge.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
this in the bridge http://www.gibsonstrings.com/pickups/young.shtml
and a 59 neck?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Getting closer to that AC/DC tone
You may want to look at a Demon for the bridge. Mine sounds alot fuller in my SG's than a '59 bridge did with smoother highs and awesome crunch. I've found the '59 neck to also be disappointing. Too much bass that over powers the highs. I'm gonna try a PG neck to see if this does the trick.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: