Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help identifying Neck "JB" pickup from a MIJ Jackson.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Another option was Jackson had a JB neck by SD
    1994 Ibanez IC500 Iceman reissue
    Jackson Soloist 7 string
    ESP LTD M-400
    Original Marshall Silver Jubilee 2553

    Comment


    • #17
      Some of those 2000s Kellies came with dual JB's from the factory. I remember one mate from another forum swapping them for a Mayhem set (DD+DDn).

      Comment


      • #18
        yeah i think the issue is jackson's specs are wrong, not that it's a mislabeled pickup. It's most likely be an OEM JB with the logo printed for the neck position.
        Quality riffs in about a minute...
        https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2B...Y3EewvQ/videos

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by superpete View Post
          yeah i think the issue is jackson's specs are wrong, not that it's a mislabeled pickup. It's most likely be an OEM JB with the logo printed for the neck position.
          Yeah, that's what I'm going with too.

          Thanks guys!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by jeremy View Post
            the neck sh6n is a very cool pup in both positions
            That's an actually-different pickup vs. the DDb though, iirc?

            JBn is supposedly not underwound or anything (at least vs. its regular spaced bridge brethren)
            "New stuff always sucks" -Me

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Adieu View Post

              That's an actually-different pickup vs. the DDb though, iirc?

              JBn is supposedly not underwound or anything (at least vs. its regular spaced bridge brethren)
              No as far as i can tell its still a 16k pickup!

              Comment


              • #22
                right, there is no "jb neck" model, its just a normal 16k a5 jb with the logo on the other coil so it looks right in the neck position. i have a sh5n which is just a 14k ceramic custom but neck spaced.

                the sh6n is a totally different pup than the sh6b

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by jeremy View Post
                  right, there is no "jb neck" model, its just a normal 16k a5 jb with the logo on the other coil so it looks right in the neck position. i have a sh5n which is just a 14k ceramic custom but neck spaced.

                  the sh6n is a totally different pup than the sh6b
                  Slugs and screws are flipped round too

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by RoMo9491
                    I picked up a 2008 Jackson KE5FR MIJ recently
                    You bought a used guitar and cannot personally account for it's complete history



                    Originally posted by RoMo9491 View Post
                    so its not just a bridge pickup put in a neck position
                    Yes. It is.


                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by GrilledChickenSalad View Post

                      You bought a used guitar and cannot personally account for it's complete history





                      Yes. It is.

                      You clearly haven't read through the entire thread before posting have you.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        This thread lol! Answered in the first reply but goes on and on in idiocy.

                        Originally posted by NegativeEase
                        I'd wager that Clint can best GuitarStv at Wat and WAAAT... but not Watts.

                        I think in the International System of Units (SI) a "WAT" is defined as a derived unit of 1 Clint besmirchment per hour

                        and WAAAT is defined as a derived unit of 1 Clint kilojoule of described Nirvana transgression per post.

                        Comment


                        • #27

                          You clearly haven't read through the entire thread before posting have you.

                          You clearly needed a reminder of the obvious, didn't you?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X