banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hot rails coil splitting vs Series/parallel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ArtieToo
    replied
    Originally posted by jeremy View Post
    parallel will maintain humcancelling in the bridge only position yes. i was referring to the middle/bridge position with the middle single coil. if you want humcancelling in that position, then you want to split the hot rails
    I gotcha. My bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeremy
    replied
    parallel will maintain humcancelling in the bridge only position yes. i was referring to the middle/bridge position with the middle single coil. if you want humcancelling in that position, then you want to split the hot rails

    Leave a comment:


  • ArtieToo
    replied
    Originally posted by jeremy View Post
    . . . if you dont care about humcancelling in that position, then id go parallel
    Did you mean "split?" Parallel will maintain hum-cancelling. I prefer parallel also, with all the "Rails" pups. Putting a Hot Rails in parallel, makes it, virtually, a "hot" Vintage Rails/Duckbucker.

    Which is a good thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mincer
    replied
    Originally posted by freefrog View Post
    When it comes to inductance and resonant peak, an Hot Rails is closer to a Strat SC when it's in parallel rather than split. Furthermore, splitting it would leave the user with a high inductance single coil, tending to be noisy (while humbucker operation is preserved with parallel wiring).
    This has been my experience. Split, it is pretty noisy, and it generally doesn't sound great. But I'd say that about splitting any of the little humbuckers. I'll split regular-sized humbuckers all day long.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeremy
    replied
    i like all three options for the hot rails. if you want humcancelling in the middle/split bridge position, then do that. if you dont care about humcancelling in that position, then id go parallel

    Leave a comment:


  • freefrog
    replied
    When it comes to inductance and resonant peak, an Hot Rails is closer to a Strat SC when it's in parallel rather than split. Furthermore, splitting it would leave the user with a high inductance single coil, tending to be noisy (while humbucker operation is preserved with parallel wiring).

    Leave a comment:


  • Mincer
    replied
    Series/Parallel. The parallel setting of Hot Rails is really usable, while split....isn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • larryguitar
    replied
    Most typical would be to split the hot rails; I'd think the second most typical would be a 'neck and bridge on' switch.

    Personally, I'd split the hot rails; gets you somewhere near a standard strat.

    Larry

    Leave a comment:


  • andrew200056
    started a topic Hot rails coil splitting vs Series/parallel

    Hot rails coil splitting vs Series/parallel

    So here is the situation, now I have Fat 50s neck, CS '69 middle and seymour duncan hot rails for bridge..Which push/pull mode would be better to get most of it?
Working...
X