Originally posted by jeremy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hot rails coil splitting vs Series/parallel
Collapse
X
-
parallel will maintain humcancelling in the bridge only position yes. i was referring to the middle/bridge position with the middle single coil. if you want humcancelling in that position, then you want to split the hot rails
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jeremy View Post. . . if you dont care about humcancelling in that position, then id go parallel
Which is a good thing.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by freefrog View PostWhen it comes to inductance and resonant peak, an Hot Rails is closer to a Strat SC when it's in parallel rather than split. Furthermore, splitting it would leave the user with a high inductance single coil, tending to be noisy (while humbucker operation is preserved with parallel wiring).
Leave a comment:
-
i like all three options for the hot rails. if you want humcancelling in the middle/split bridge position, then do that. if you dont care about humcancelling in that position, then id go parallel
Leave a comment:
-
When it comes to inductance and resonant peak, an Hot Rails is closer to a Strat SC when it's in parallel rather than split. Furthermore, splitting it would leave the user with a high inductance single coil, tending to be noisy (while humbucker operation is preserved with parallel wiring).
Leave a comment:
-
Series/Parallel. The parallel setting of Hot Rails is really usable, while split....isn't.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Most typical would be to split the hot rails; I'd think the second most typical would be a 'neck and bridge on' switch.
Personally, I'd split the hot rails; gets you somewhere near a standard strat.
Larry
Leave a comment:
-
Hot rails coil splitting vs Series/parallel
So here is the situation, now I have Fat 50s neck, CS '69 middle and seymour duncan hot rails for bridge..Which push/pull mode would be better to get most of it?Tags: None
Leave a comment: