banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

    Is one better then the other? Is one more appropriate for volume and another for tone? I have heard before that there is a difference in usable range for one compared to the other, is this true?

    Looking to replace the pots in my new Carvin CS4 with CTS 500k pots... Want to make sure this is the right call, will this make any changes to tone or just usability of the pots?

    Also, IRT to Caps, I have little to no knowledge in this arena... How do caps affect tone, how significant is that affect and what would be the right cap to achieve a PAF sound in my Carvin CS4...

    Thanks for the knowledge sharing guys, as always it is much appreciated...

    -J
    "This is my hat now, this is totally my hat..."

  • #2
    Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

    there is no difference in tone, only in the taper. at 10 both will be 100%, at 0 they will both be 0%. at 5 the linear will be at 50% and the audio will be less than that maybe 25% or so, i cant remember exactly, but audio rolls off faster. i used to prefer audio but ive been happier with linear recently. one isnt better than the other really, only what works better for you.

    for caps .02 (or .022) and .047 (or .05) are the most common for guitars. they change what frequency is rolled off when using the tone control. a higher value cap will give you a darker sound with less treble than a smaller value cap when the tone is at 0.

    a paf sound is easy in your carvin, a paf in a les paul sound from your carvin is gonna be much harder. old les pauls used .047 caps if i remember correctly

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

      Choosing audio (log) vs. linear depends on what you will be using the pot for. You should always use audio pots for volume control, otherwise you will find that the volume does not change smoothly as you turn the pot up and down. With a linear taper pot, you will find that the volume increases slowly from 0 to about 60 or 70 percent, then increases rapidly from that point on. This is because there isn't a direct relationship between resistance and volume in a passive circuit (which is what a guitar with passive pickups is). Audio taper pots compensate for this, and give you a consistent volume change throughout the sweep.

      A tone control, on the other hand, works best with a linear taper pot. The role of a tone control is to feed part of your signal to a capacitor that bleeds the treble to ground. In order to have a smooth transition from bright tone to mellow tone, the pot has to be linear. You can use an audio taper pot in a tone control, but you won't find the tone roll-off to be as smooth as it could be.

      Regarding capacitors: a guitar's tone circuit is what is known as a passive low pass filter. The capacitor only lets high frequencies through, and it dumps these frequencies to ground. Whatever is left (low frequencies) continues on to the volume control and out the jack to the amp. This is why it's called a low pass, because the lows "pass" through the circuit while the highs are blocked.

      As Jeremy said, the value of the cap determines at what point in the frequency spectrum the frequency cut-off occurs. The higher the cap value, the lower the cut-off point will be. In other words, higher value caps will make your tone darker when the tone control is set below 10. Strats and Teles generally have .022 uF caps and Les Pauls generally have .047 uF caps. I have seen guitars with caps as high as .068 and as low as .010.

      This concludes today's lecture
      Band: www.colouredanimal.com
      Twitter: www.twitter.com/mrperki
      Blorg: mrperki.tumblr.com

      Read my Seymour Duncan blog posts

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

        What RD said. I'm tempted to just steal it and put my name on it.

        Oh, but pedantic as I am, I must point out that, because of the pickups' inductance, a resonance peak develops just below the cutoff frequency when the tone knob nears 0. That's how Danny Gatton and Roy Buchanon managed to get that "cocked wah" sound from their tone controls.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

          every one is right on the money here but i want to point out one thing.

          in theory audio taper is what you want for volume contols, but what i have found is that if you use a cranked up tube amp linear pots can work better. i use a humbucker loaded guitar straight into a deluxe reverb and turn it up to 6. at that point the amp is cooking really nicely giving me a sweet overdriven tone. in order to clean it up i roll back the volume control. using a linear taper pot i have much more control over the clean to dirty ratio of the tone. with an audio taper it goes from dirty to cleanish very quickly making it hard to dial in shades of dirt.

          if dont use an amp cranked up to get your tone then this isnt a consideration but i wanted to clarify why i said "i used to prefer audio but ive been happier with linear recently"

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

            Hey, thanks for the info jeremy. It makes sense that the increased sensitivity would work better with a linear taper, I never thought about it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

              Originally posted by ParameterMan View Post
              What RD said. I'm tempted to just steal it and put my name on it.

              Oh, but pedantic as I am, I must point out that, because of the pickups' inductance, a resonance peak develops just below the cutoff frequency when the tone knob nears 0. That's how Danny Gatton and Roy Buchanon managed to get that "cocked wah" sound from their tone controls.
              Interesting ... makes sense.

              Originally posted by jeremy View Post
              every one is right on the money here but i want to point out one thing.

              in theory audio taper is what you want for volume contols, but what i have found is that if you use a cranked up tube amp linear pots can work better. i use a humbucker loaded guitar straight into a deluxe reverb and turn it up to 6. at that point the amp is cooking really nicely giving me a sweet overdriven tone. in order to clean it up i roll back the volume control. using a linear taper pot i have much more control over the clean to dirty ratio of the tone. with an audio taper it goes from dirty to cleanish very quickly making it hard to dial in shades of dirt.

              if dont use an amp cranked up to get your tone then this isnt a consideration but i wanted to clarify why i said "i used to prefer audio but ive been happier with linear recently"
              In this situation you're using your volume pot more like one would use a preamp volume control on an amp or a pedal, and in that sense a linear taper pot is the best call.

              If you're using your volume pot as a plain vanilla volume knob, like most people do, audio taper is best.
              Band: www.colouredanimal.com
              Twitter: www.twitter.com/mrperki
              Blorg: mrperki.tumblr.com

              Read my Seymour Duncan blog posts

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                I typically let my pedals color my tone more or less... I do use the volume but usually to go straight from Brown to Clean, for the in-between I come down on my volume pedal or switch the OD pedal I am using...
                "This is my hat now, this is totally my hat..."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                  Wow, A LOT of wisdom here!

                  Let me just add that in all my guitars I have audio taper pots and that like jeremy I also use the volume knob to control the amount of "dirt" in my guitar.
                  (usually I like it when the amp is JUST about to break where I can actually control the amount of dirt with my picking hand)

                  However after some time I got really used to dialing it with an audio pot that now I can almost automatically go for the various sweet spots so chances are I'd find it harder the other way around!!!

                  In short, while every single person in this thread was 100% correct there is always the subjective factor of what YOU'll like the best and what will work the best FOR YOU.

                  Personally, I see myself keeping an audio pot for volume but probably swapping to a linear pot for tone since that's where I'm having the most problem finding the sweet spot of...
                  Originally posted by Blue_Fingers_Jay
                  I prefer cheaper guitars, nothing is as cool as a cheap guitar that sounds awesome.
                  Originally posted by That90'sGuy
                  Not all guitars are created equal, so make sure it sings and if it does, you'd be silly to pass it up.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                    When you buy a pot on the internet it doesn't say whether it's an audio taper or linear taper. I'm assuming all the pots I bought were traditional audio(logarithmic)taper for my Stratocaster.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                      Originally posted by 357mag View Post
                      When you buy a pot on the internet it doesn't say whether it's an audio taper or linear taper. I'm assuming all the pots I bought were traditional audio(logarithmic)taper for my Stratocaster.
                      Probably, but not necessarily. If you want to know if a new pot is audio or linear taper (before it's installed in a circuit), set the shaft at the halfway point and measure the resistance from the middle tab to each of the outside tabs on the pot. If the values are close to equal, it's linear. if the values are more like an 80:20 ratio, it's audio taper.
                      www.chuckhawley.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                        I agree with all the points, but especially with Jeremy's personal preference on Linear over Audio taper. It's purely preference.
                        "Well, if I knew I probably had to play this song for the rest of my life, I probably would have written something else! ...But it's too late you're stuck with this one" Joe Walsh on 'Rocky Mountain Way'
                        .
                        Churchill - "Democracy is the worst form of Government. Except for all the others!"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                          I wish there was a taper between audio and linear. If there is, please tell me!

                          I use my volume knob to go from mid-gain dirty to clean. With linear taper I find the change between 10 and 3 to be barely noticable - all the "cleaning up" happens between 3 and 0. With audio taper I find all the cleaning up happens between 10 and 6, and below 4 the tone gets pretty thin, so I rarely use the volume below 4.

                          Of the two I find audio taper preferable (more usable settings) but a compromise would be sweet!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                            Originally posted by Simon_F View Post
                            I wish there was a taper between audio and linear. If there is, please tell me!

                            I use my volume knob to go from mid-gain dirty to clean. With linear taper I find the change between 10 and 3 to be barely noticable - all the "cleaning up" happens between 3 and 0. With audio taper I find all the cleaning up happens between 10 and 6, and below 4 the tone gets pretty thin, so I rarely use the volume below 4.

                            Of the two I find audio taper preferable (more usable settings) but a compromise would be sweet!
                            you should check out the rs superpots!
                            "He who is a legend in his own time is ruled by that legend."
                            - Victor Hugo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Audio Taper vs. Linear Taper (whats what) and Cap Questions...

                              there is two "commonly" available log tapers but if you can get your hands on a USA Hamer pot, the taper is wonderful. i used to bribe the local hamer guy to get me some but hes gone now

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X