banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

    I actually like Pau Ferro on my Warmoth build a lot. Feels a lot like Rosewood.

    Tonally, there could be a difference, but not much. Maybe a touch snappier and a touch brighter?

    I went with Pau Ferro because I liked the way it felt to play and it matched my aesthetic on the guitar better because it is slightly brighter in color.
    Last edited by GreatOz; 06-01-2019, 04:28 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

      Originally posted by Nostalgic Distortion View Post
      The problem with Ebony is that it’s very hard to buy it in bulk without going into black or gray market territory. There’s Chinese logging companies that go cut down beautiful & very old growth trees without any permits or any right. Then it gets loaded onto ships where where it’s sold in international waters (A lot like what North Korea does with oil & coal to subvert US sanctions.) where nobody really has any authority to do anything about it.

      Personally I’ve played some Black Palm fingerboards that we’re absolutely beautiful! It sounded just like ebony, feels like ebony, looks like ebony, & most importantly its a very sustainable fast growing hardwood. I’ve got a feeling that we’ll start seeing Black Palm on fingerboards in coming years...
      There are a lot of new and great woods (previously overlooked) that work well with guitars and the sort of tone you want to have - as well as the stability and workability you need from a construction aspect. Its just the drag weight of player traditionalism that stops many of the main brands from including them. Both Gibson and Fender use Pau Ferro, but you should hear the ignorant punters whinging on the specialist forums over those guitars......its like the apocalypse has arrived.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

        Pau Ferro adds the most snap to the note attack among the common rosewoods to me. Not on maple level and not nearly on ebony level. If it is up to a choice and on the same type of guitar the Indian rosewood is too soft or the maple is too snappy, Pau Ferro is a nice one in-between, more towards the rosewood side.

        It is all about the feel / response. On a measurable output for some objective result, they are not more than a couple of percents away from each other I guess. Pickups make a vastly bigger change.
        Wackor
        Ørdøg
        NecroPolo
        Diabolus in Musica
        SIDrip Alliance
        Book of Shadows
        RKH

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

          Originally posted by GreatOz View Post
          I actually like Pau Ferro on my Warmoth build a lot. Feels a lot like Rosewood.

          Tonally, there could be a difference, but not much. Maybe a touch snappier and a touch brighter?

          I went with Pau Ferro because I liked the way it felt to play and it matched my aesthetic on the guitar better because it is slightly brighter in color.
          I went with Pau Ferro and baked maple on my Warmoth strat neck and I absolutely love it.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

            I've noticed a lot of you are saying that certain fretboard woods play better. How do you figure? I can see how a finished fretboard would play different from an unfinished one if you had really low frets, but I personally only notice that I touch the fretboard when I'm doing insane bends, and never do my strings touch it. My frets tend to be medium jumbo or jumbo by the way.
            You will never understand How it feels to live your life With no meaning or control And with nowhere left to go You are amazed that they exist And they burn so bright
            Whilst you can only wonder why

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

              Ebony has a closer tighter grain
              And even unfinished it feels smooth

              Rosewood is a bit coarse
              And even unfinished feels warmer under the fingers

              Oiled maple feels slick like ebony but kinda cold

              The smooth boards makes bends easier
              As does taller frets
              Last edited by ehdwuld; 06-02-2019, 07:42 PM. Reason: Cant spell
              EHD
              Just here surfing Guitar Pron
              RG2EX1 w/ SD hot-rodded pickups / RG4EXFM1 w/ Carvin S22j/b + FVN middle
              SR500 / Martin 000CE-1/Epiphone Hummingbird
              Epiphone Florentine with OEM Probuckers
              Ehdwuld branded Blue semi hollow custom with JB/Jazz
              Reptile Green Gibson Custom Studio / Aqua Dean Shire semi hollow with piezo
              Carvin Belair / Laney GC80A Acoustic Amp (a gift from Guitar Player Mag)
              GNX3000 (yea I'm a modeler)

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                Originally posted by NegativeEase View Post
                My favorite feeling fretboard is Ebony -and its not even close -I know it's bright and hard but you can play so much faster and smoother...

                not sure why its not more popular -maybe the cost?
                Well, in metal it is THE fingerboard wood, so maybe it depends on genre...

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                  Originally posted by weepingminotaur View Post
                  Well, in metal it is THE fingerboard wood, so maybe it depends on genre...
                  I think that's more to match the black aesthetic of the rest of the guitar than anything.
                  You will never understand How it feels to live your life With no meaning or control And with nowhere left to go You are amazed that they exist And they burn so bright
                  Whilst you can only wonder why

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                    Originally posted by Chistopher View Post
                    I think that's more to match the black aesthetic of the rest of the guitar than anything.
                    Respectfully disagree. Ebony is a faster fingerboard wood for most players, and if you're playing metal, chances are you're playing fast. I mean, I'm sure the "none more black" aesthetic doesn't hurt, but playability is key.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                      Originally posted by weepingminotaur View Post
                      Respectfully disagree. Ebony is a faster fingerboard wood for most players, and if you're playing metal, chances are you're playing fast. I mean, I'm sure the "none more black" aesthetic doesn't hurt, but playability is key.
                      Most metal players I know use frets tall enough to make the wood on their fretboard utterly irrelevant to their speed.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                        Originally posted by chadd View Post
                        Most metal players I know use frets tall enough to make the wood on their fretboard utterly irrelevant to their speed.
                        Yeah Ebony is definitely faster playing IME, but honestly most metal speedster masters have such a light touch that they are not interacting with the fretboard no matter how low the fret height is.
                        “For me, when everything goes wrong – that’s when adventure starts.” Yvonne Chouinard

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                          Originally posted by NegativeEase View Post
                          Yeah Ebony is definitely faster playing IME, but honestly most metal speedster masters have such a light touch that they are not interacting with the fretboard no matter how low the fret height is.
                          I agree. Light strings, jumbo frets, low string height, guitar steup like a race car, relaxed wrists, small moves, light picking, sublte relaxed precise movement - these definitely describe the majority of high-speed metal shredders I've worked with in the studio.

                          Rhythm-only guitarists however seem to have much heavier picking hands / natural tone and at the end of the day, in many cases the rhythm guitarist owns left-right guitars in the mix that make 90% the song and the lighter more precise soloist does all the fills / tricky pars / solos that just adds to the feel 10% - then some time larer everyone seems to cherish the soloist.

                          Something is definitely wrong with the world
                          Last edited by NecroPolo; 06-03-2019, 05:49 AM. Reason: typos
                          Wackor
                          Ørdøg
                          NecroPolo
                          Diabolus in Musica
                          SIDrip Alliance
                          Book of Shadows
                          RKH

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                            Originally posted by NecroPolo View Post
                            I agree. Light strings, jumbo frets, low string height, guitar steup like a race car, relaxed wrists, small moves, light picking, sublte relaxed precise movement - these definitely describe the majority of high-speed metal shredders I've worked with in the studio.

                            Rhythm-only guitarists however seem to have much heavier picking hands / natural tone and at the end of the day, in many cases the rhythm guitarist owns left-right guitars in the mix that make 90% the song and the lighter more precise soloist does all the fills / tricky pars / solos that just adds to the feel 10% - then some time larer everyone seems to cherish the soloist.

                            Something is definitely wrong with the world
                            Yeah, I'm pretty heavy handed/touch -so i do big strings, tall frets on most of mine.
                            “For me, when everything goes wrong – that’s when adventure starts.” Yvonne Chouinard

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                              Originally posted by NecroPolo View Post
                              I agree. Light strings, jumbo frets, low string height, guitar steup like a race car, relaxed wrists, small moves, light picking, sublte relaxed precise movement - these definitely describe the majority of high-speed metal shredders I've worked with in the studio.

                              Rhythm-only guitarists however seem to have much heavier picking hands / natural tone and at the end of the day, in many cases the rhythm guitarist owns left-right guitars in the mix that make 90% the song and the lighter more precise soloist does all the fills / tricky pars / solos that just adds to the feel 10% - then some time larer everyone seems to cherish the soloist.

                              Something is definitely wrong with the world
                              Yeah, I've got a pretty heavy picking hand too, though I'm trying to get lighter so I can play faster. :P

                              As for the rhythm/lead thing, I get you, although to me it's usually a "whole is greater than the sum of its parts" thing. I can't think of Friedman's solos without Mustaine's rhythm, and vice-versa.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Rosewood vs Pau Ferro

                                Originally posted by Ed Driscoll
                                I'm not good enough to tell a difference. I was at Roscoe guitars the other day and met Gene Baker, I was told all they use is SPAM LINK REMOVED Pau Ferro[/URL]. They said its more consistent and had better sustain.
                                You're making a comment to a 3 year old thread?!

                                If you've got some feelings about these wood types, start your own thread and let us know what they are.
                                Originally Posted by IanBallard
                                Rule of thumb... the more pot you have, the better your tone.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X