banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

    I own SD humbucker, P90s, strat and tele Antiquities and they ALL sound extremely great. I love them.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

      The degaussing in vintage pickups is by no means a guaranteed thing. In fact it is more likely a way of making a modern magnet sound more like a fully charged vintage one rather than trying to mimic something that you would expect to see in a vintage pickup.....except of course for p90's where the 2 mags are set repelling.
      Additionally a common method is to adjust the charge to adjust eq to meet a certain target tone - in ways you cannot do with the wind.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

        You really know your stuff Alex.
        My Sound Clips

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

          Another benefit is reduced string pull - which may be more of a factor in the tone issues than many seem to believe.
          .
          "You should know better by now than to introduce science into a discussion of voodoo."
          .

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

            That makes sense. You can get it a little closer to the strings and not worry about stratitis.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

              The guy told me earlier that it was about 80% charged and he didn't know how it would sound fully charged on account that he has never tried an SSL-1.

              So I assume the flat stagger of the polepieces will give a minor increase to bass and presence, the higher number of turns will roll of the treble, and the degaussed magnet might open up the lower mids a bit? Am I on the right track here?

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

                Originally posted by '59 View Post
                Am I on the right track here?
                Yep. In theory, that set should sound pretty close to a stock SSL-2 set.

                /Peter
                Peter Pedersen aka Discharged
                Kolding, Denmark

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Degaussed Versus Regular Magnets

                  Flatpole is better for string balance -- counterintuitive as that sounds. I learned it the hard way when I made a radiused set for a guy with a 9.5" radius. Nailed the radius in that it followed the radius contour just this side of perfect. But the D and G dominated, A and B were kind of there and the E strings sounded like they were coming from somewhere down the block. Then I read Lollar somewhere on line saying flatpole is best for balance and I would not have believed him prior to this experience. It certainly seems to be true. It also allows you to get the coil a little closer to the strings because there aren't those tall rods in the middle blocking those few extra twists of the screw driver so that may explain the overall punchiness and Tele-ish-ness of flapoles.

                  FWIW, I think rod magnet single coils and P90s sound better fully charged while buckers sound better with a little of the edge taken off. Again counterintuitive but what can I say...
                  Generic signature line.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X