12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

DrNewcenstein

He Did the Monster Mash
It was mentioned in a recent thread that 12BZ7s are higher-gain than 12AX7s, so I picked up a few and tested them in my ADA MP-1.

The MP-1 used for the tests came to me with Sovtek 12AX7s in V1 and V2. They look fairly new. There's what appears to be a date code of 05 12. Not sure if that's Dec 2005 or May 2012.

The 12BZ7s (RCA) are old and used, but the listing claimed "tested strong". I would have to dig out my Dad's old tube tester to find out for myself. Probably have better luck finding Bigfoot.

The guitar used for the tests was mahogany/mahogany neckthrough, maple top, with a TB 59 with an A2 in the bridge and a 59 with a regular ceramic (A5-sized) in the neck.

At any rate, the first thing I did was set up a patch with the EQ zeroed (no boost, no cut), Gain 1 and Gain 2 on 0 (dead quiet), and the Master Volume on 5 (goes up to 10, so halfway), and set for Distorted Tube voicing.

Monitored through the headphone jack in the back of it.

I used the stock Sovteks first, then repeated the same steps with the RCAs.

Test:
Gain 1 on 10
Gain 2 on 0

Sovteks: Though the signal was weak, it was audible. Didn't have to strain to hear it, but it wasn't going to peel any paint.
Would need EQ tweaks to be useable but not a bad sound to start with.

12BZ7s: Failed on the first try. Same setting had the same saturation, but the volume was about 50%-75% of what the Sovteks put out.
The volume setting could have easily been tweaked to match the Sovtek output levels, but that doesn't really strike me as definitive of "higher gain". I would have expected more saturation while keeping the current volume at least, or maybe a slight increase in volume along with more gain.

I did record the tests with both sets of tubes, and looking at the waveforms, they appear nearly identical in volume on the later tests, where Gain 2 was set between 7 and 10 and Gain 1 was set between 3 and 5.
In those, the saturation levels also sounded identical to me. Certainly not as drastic a difference as I was expecting. I'd have to scrutinize each waveform to see the exact differences.

Running through some of the patches in the unit, from glassy cleans to face-melt, I'm still not detecting any "wow, that's hot" with the BZs. I imagine compared to AXs of the same vintage, there'd be a noticeable difference.

Next, I put an AX in V1 and a BZ in V2 and repeated the test.
Again, the BZ held it back.

Next, I put the BZ in V1 and an AX in V2.
Again, the BZ is not showing any signs of having more gain, and Gain 1 on 10 was still rather weak.

In summary, if you've got an amp running vintage 12AX7s and you want more gain, and you want to keep it period-correct for some reason, you might want to look into some vintage 12BZ7s, as I hear they're higher gain.
If you've got an amp running more-recent 12AX7s and you want more gain, you might want to look into having it modded.
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

I have picked up a few 12BZ7's from Ebay, but haven't tried them out yet. They are a slightly bigger bottle, and draw slightly more filament current, so I wouldn't use more than one in an amp unless the filament supply can handle the extra draw. I have black plates and grey plates, going to give them a try soon.
Al
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

Nice review. Too bad they didn't give you what you expected.
I'm doing some web research on them now and I'm getting mixed results.

Anyway, the highest gain I've found for modern 12ax7's are the JJ's and the Chinese made (I buy the latter selected by TAD). Have you tried those already?
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

Only others I've tried is a Penta Tube 12AX7. That is definitely a winner. With that tube in V1, a Sovtek in V2, Gain 1 on 10 and Gain 2 on 0, MV on 5, and the EQ on 0, I get a very nice base for an AC/DC type of tone (Shook Me All Night Long, Back In Black, etc). With Sovteks in both slots and the same settings, it's more of a Bad Moon Rising tone.

But, I feel I must retract my statement against the BZ: I'm listening again to the test recordings I made (I can crank it a bit more at the moment, and my ears have rested a bit since then), and while there is a noticeable difference in volume with the aforementioned settings, I must say the saturation appears to be double that of the Sovteks.

I'll work more with it this weekend when I'm off, and try to come up with something to post so others can judge the differences.
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

The Penta Tube is the latest Chinese 12ax7 from what I know. Same as Groove Tubes 12AX7-C or the TAD version I have in my Mesa Studio. It usually does pay off to buy them additionally tested and selected and pay a bit more though. I used to use Chinese in V1 and JJ in V2 of my old Marshall JMP-1 and felt that that was the gainiest it was going to get. Feel like dusting off my MP-1 now.
Looking forward to your additional observations.
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

Only others I've tried is a Penta Tube 12AX7. That is definitely a winner. With that tube in V1, a Sovtek in V2, Gain 1 on 10 and Gain 2 on 0, MV on 5, and the EQ on 0, I get a very nice base for an AC/DC type of tone (Shook Me All Night Long, Back In Black, etc). With Sovteks in both slots and the same settings, it's more of a Bad Moon Rising tone.

But, I feel I must retract my statement against the BZ: I'm listening again to the test recordings I made (I can crank it a bit more at the moment, and my ears have rested a bit since then), and while there is a noticeable difference in volume with the aforementioned settings, I must say the saturation appears to be double that of the Sovteks.

I'll work more with it this weekend when I'm off, and try to come up with something to post so others can judge the differences.


Are'nt they a LOT brighter/treblier &/or thinner sounding? ...that's what put me off trying them a while ago. Plus many are supposed to be very microphonic?
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

In summary, if you've got an amp running vintage 12AX7s and you want more gain, and you want to keep it period-correct for some reason, you might want to look into some vintage 12BZ7s, as I hear they're higher gain.
If you've got an amp running more-recent 12AX7s and you want more gain, you might want to look into having it modded.
I find this kind of a weird statement from my own experience as the two sets of vintage 12AX7's I've used (black plate RCA's and some no-names out of an AC30) where higher gain then any current production 12AX7's I've used (Tung Sols, Sovteks, JJ's, EHX).
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

Are'nt they a LOT brighter/treblier &/or thinner sounding? ...that's what put me off trying them a while ago. Plus many are supposed to be very microphonic?

So far my BZs haven't gone microphonic, despite I've only had them about a week and only used two for about 30 minutes total. I'm guessing I beat the average :lol:

I haven't notice the tone getting thinner or brighter, just the decrease in volume.

However, here's some info from a guy over at ADADepot:
The problem with these tubes is that they draw twice the heater current of a 12AX7 (300mA on 12V).Problem is that the mp-1 transformer can barely handle the 12ax7 heater current (150mA at 12V).Now the mp-1 transformer only puts out around 8 to 9V depending on the wall voltage.This tube could lower this voltage even more so you could get some brown outs and this will result in rebooting.Maybe even destroy the transformer if you use 2 of these.

Gainwise these are the same as the 12ax7 but the plate resistance is lower and the transconductance is higher.Actually one triode of a 12BZ7 is the same if you would put the 2 triodes of a 12AX7 in parallel.

So there's that.

I find this kind of a weird statement from my own experience as the two sets of vintage 12AX7's I've used (black plate RCA's and some no-names out of an AC30) where higher gain then any current production 12AX7's I've used (Tung Sols, Sovteks, JJ's, EHX).

I'm assuming by "vintage" you mean "not made in Russia, China, or Mexico"? If they were made in America or Great Britain, I could see that being possible.
 
Re: 12BZ7 vs 12AX7 test results

I'm assuming by "vintage" you mean "not made in Russia, China, or Mexico"? If they were made in America or Great Britain, I could see that being possible.

Which tubes are currently made in Mexico? Weren't some RCA's fabricated there back in the day?
As far as I knew, only China (Shuguang), Russia (New Sensor and Svetlana) and Slovakia (JJ) are still producing tubes.
Wish the UN didn't bomb the EI plant (actually wish there would not have been a need for it). Nice sounding stuff if you get your hands on a good one.
 
Back
Top