Re: A pickup physics questions
Thanks for the replies everyone. So as I understand it from having a look at these answers and then following these points around the internet, is that impedance is in AC what resistance is in DC, but impedance is more
complex, because in AC there is reactance to be considered; reactance being the property of capacitor or inductor that means they more strongly oppose current at higher frequencies.
The next logical question I suppose, is why reactance should oppose current depending on frequency? I guess explaining that means getting into some pretty gnarly theory, but if anyone wants to have a go at explaining, it'd be very welcome.
Ok, impedance is NOT more complex than resistance, it IS resistance. You might be confusing inductance. That is definitely more complex.
Reactance is its own thing and should NEVER be considered in guitar circuits. It is a reality, yes but it is a very theoretical value which will not play much of a role in small signal electronics. Your statement is right, but just try to think of capacitance on its own and save yourself the headaches. In the majority of cases, it is a minimal loss. In 3-phase power electrical machines it becomes a big deal.
Reactance is the result of the time-delay in charging up a capacitance which creates phase issues. You will temporarily cut parts of a wave signal, affecting its harmonics as well. When the capacitor discharges, it is providing more energy/power than the signal originally had but for a very short time (a pulse really) and this sets up a new, different set of harmonics. Because wave signals are additive, you will emphasize some frequencies and attenuate others. This is how the sound gets affected when you fool around with all the components AND you can arrange the components in any number of ways (series, parallel, loops). Usually we limit ourselves to very simple circuits in guitars and we obtain plenty of artistic colors for making music. If you really wanted to get scientific about it, you could open up an infinite range of tones which in the end would not be much more useful than what's available to us now. That's partly why so little has changed in electric guitars over the past 60 years or so.
If you want to know why it doesn't matter much in guitars, consider how the frequency of a simple machine runs of 60 Hz (or 50 Hz in other parts of the world) coming out of your wall. Doesn't matter what it is; a coffee maker, pump, iron, heater, etc. In a guitar playing music, the frequency changes CONSTANTLY. Are you going to try and calculate each and every frequency? What good will it do? None because you could never make a circuit which would be "right" for all frequencies. You can try but it becomes pretty silly pretty fast. That's why some basic tone shaping tools are handy and we use them without worrying about the calculations for this vast array of parameters which doesn't amount to a hill of beans.
"Did he play good?"
"Ya man, you should have heard the reactance of his bridge pickup during the second solo. He really needs another 2pi/5 of phase correction there. I think his tubes were exhibiting sag in the mu value because he didn't bias right and he should have at least another 1,200 ohms on the primary of his output transformer!" I don't think so...
You seem REALLY interested in the physics of all this, you should buy a textbook or take a course. It's fascinating but I find wiring my own guitars and amps plenty rewarding without becoming an electrical engineer. Better to use your ears.
In case you're wondering I'm a materials engineer and had to take a bunch of electrical courses for my degree but I was guitar player first, so I sat in those courses filtering everything through my sick guitar gear mind. I really enjoyed learning how all my gear worked but the math was brutal and exams were bloody hard.