Re: Boogie Bill!!!!!Mesa ?'s
Jaydub's post brings up a great point.
When we talk about amps, are you talking about an amp for live performance; or for studio work, or as a practice amp? My thought is that a Peavey Blazer isn't what you'd want to use for live performance, but it's fine as a practice amp, and would probably give you some great recorded tones. Your 200-watt Marshall Major is perfect for deafening the people in the back row at Woodstock, but it's not suitable for a practice amp.
One of the big knocks on some of Mesa's amps is that, "Well, it gets a great clean/crunch/distortion [pick one], but then the clean/crunch/distortion [pick a different one] SUCKS!"
Let's look at the Studio .22+. AHA! There's a tip right there! "STUDIO"!!! In a studio, you don't need an amp that channel switches! You are going to set up the rig, play the track, and then punch in any overdubs and additional tracks with a rig designed to lay down the best tone for that track. Nothing is in REAL-TIME.
Having a versatile, channel-switching in the studio can be a real asset. A Studio .22 or a Mark IV can sound like many different amps. In a STUDIO, where you can take the time to tweak the tone of each track (and not just with amp settings, but using different mics and processors, etc.), a Swiss-Army knife amp like a Studio .22 or Mark IV can actually SAVE a lot of time.
I've been using a Mark IV for live club use for about three years. There are about 15 different amps in that box; considering the three channels, the Class A/Simul-Class option, the Presence Shift on the R2 and LEAD channels, the Harmonics/Mid-Gain Shift, TWEED/FULL POWER and the various tube options. For me, I've been happy using just a few of those options for my live gigs; but I'm sure that in a recording environment, I'd be exploring many more of them.
The disadvantage of an amp like the Mark IV is that it does take a bit of a learning curve. A lot of guys just aren't willing to do that. They want "turn-everyting-on-10-instant-gratification". That won't work with most Mesa amps. I think for live use, my Mark III amps are probably the easiest to use. I just set all the knobs where Boogie tells you to set them--right at the sweet spots--and the tone is killer! I may do a bit of tweaking here and there for various guitars or different songs, but generally the sweet spot is where I like to stay. In turn, what is SO amazing about the Mark IV is that it has so many different sweet spots.
Mesas don't have a lot of bass; they design them to keep your tone from muddying up the sound of the band. You don't need to blast away in the low register--that's for the bassist. If you need more bass from a Mesa combo, look into getting a Theile cab. And the EL84s of that amp will attenuate the top-end, too. You won't get the open, airy top-end of a 6L6 or 6V6 Fender. You will get a rounded, chimey top-end. If you're used to a Fender amp, this can take some getting used to. Just remember, it isn't "wrong", it's just different.
That fat mid-range tone makes your guitar sing ever so sweetly. You won't get buzz-saw gain, but these tones are perfect for blues and classic rock. And what Falstaff said is so true--the tone of YOUR guitar comes through. Every guitar I have ever plugged into my Mesa amps has sounded its best! With my G&L Legacys, my Mark III produces solid clean tones; a dark crunchy R2 tone; and searing lead tones.
Mark Series amps are better at getting great tones LIVE. You can use the Studio .22 and the .50 Caliber live; but by their very nature, there are some compromises. In the controlled environment of the studio, the need for instantly-gratifying channel-switching is a non-issue.
As so many of the other posters pointed out, for DirtyKing's intended uses as outlined in his original post--the Studio .22+ should be a great amp to have.
Bill