What is the practical difference between a 500k and 0.01uf in parallel with eachother versus just using a 0.047uf?
[...]
Also one point of disagreement I see on the threads. Is the effect subtle or not?
Also whats the cleanest way to do the install if I only have 2 conductors on my neck pickup? I've always been bad at twisting a cap and resistor into parallel
This graphic from the first thread shows how to do it with 2 conductor.
![]()
3)Wire your neck pickup to its regular tone control. Then go through a series cap from the tone pot to the volume control. It will avoid any conflict between bass-cut/hi-pass and hi-cut/low-pass circuits.
As I forgot to mention earlier, I have a master volume and master tone control, so I guess I have to put the de-mud portion before the tone control. How will this conflict look in terms of when I'm actually playing?
As I forgot to mention earlier, I have a master volume and master tone control, so I guess I have to put the de-mud portion before the tone control. How will this conflict look in terms of when I'm actually playing?



Yep, the smaller the series cap, the more bass it cuts... /QUOTE]
Isn't it the larger of the cap cuts more bass? No cap = no bass cut.

Yep, the smaller the series cap, the more bass it cuts... /QUOTE]
Isn't it the larger of the cap cuts more bass? No cap = no bass cut.
Caps block low frequencies, the metaphor I always use is a smaller cap has less room for the bass to fit through.
Caps block low frequencies, the metaphor I always use is a smaller cap has less room for the bass to fit through.
Caps in series block low freq's. Caps in parallel block high freq's. Sorta, kinda. It does depend on the circuit.
Caps in series block low freq's. Caps in parallel block high freq's. Sorta, kinda. It does depend on the circuit.
Caps always act as a short for high frequencies and an open circuit for low frequencies. So if you put a cap in parallel with a widget, it lets the high frequencies sneak past it, and from the widgets perspective it only sees lows.