Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Aceman

Aceman

I am your doctor of love!
A Pedal called the Duncan ITL

ITL stands for "In the Loop"

This is a Multi-fx with the following:

Modulation, Delay, Reverb. You could use your current awesome algorithms!

Pedal works like this:

Signal: Input>Modulation>Send/rec for adding pedal>Delay>Reverb> Out
Switchable for line/loop levels
Delay has blend for front vs loop loading

Modulation: Chorus, Flanger, Phaser, Tremolo, Vibe, Vibrato - two or three variations of each
Delay: Analog, Tape, Digital, Dotted 8ths, tap
Reverb: Room, Hall, Plate, blah blah blah

All of this stuff Gated or not, tails or not.

150 user programmable spots.

Bonus for global EQ and boost at very end of chain.
 
Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

I’ll take that with 149 user slots, I’m feeling generous this morning.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Extra bonus points for a built in Blue Tooth transmitter to a detachable/sepearte foot switch for up front on the floor!
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Just get a rack unit like something from TC. They are made for FX loops


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Why Duncan? I'd rather someone else make it...which they probably already do. Every Duncan pedal I've owned has been overpriced for the amount of quality, and has had parts crap out. Their electronic designs (i.e. features/controls and tone) are excellent, but the build quality is just not there. I only buy Duncan pedals used for a significant price savings, and expect to upgrade components as they break...as I've had to do on every single one.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

ItsaBass said:
Every Duncan pedal I've owned has been overpriced for the amount of quality, and has had parts crap out. Their electronic designs (i.e. features/controls and tone) are excellent, but the build quality is just not there. I only buy Duncan pedals used for a significant price savings, and expect to upgrade components as they break...as I've had to do on every single one.
Click to expand...

Is that for analog or digital? I’ve had no problems but I’ve only done OD/boosts.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Most of the time I like vibe and phaser in front of the amp, not in the loop.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

GuitarStv said:
Most of the time I like vibe and phaser in front of the amp, not in the loop.
Click to expand...

Same here. Chorus I'm 50/50 on (ITL vs front of amp) but flange I like in front. Delays, reverbs, and tremolos are the only things I like in the loop.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Blille said:
I use phaser in front of the OD
Click to expand...

Well then don't use the Phaser in the loop and drop your favorite stomp right there on the floor.

I just want an "All Ambience" pedal for the loop. I don't want pitch shifters, distortions, autowahs, Ring Modulators, Compressors and all that crap. Just swirl repeat and space. In the loop.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Aceman said:
Well then don't use the Phaser in the loop and drop your favorite stomp right there on the floor.

I just want an "All Ambience" pedal for the loop. I don't want pitch shifters, distortions, autowahs, Ring Modulators, Compressors and all that crap. Just swirl repeat and space. In the loop.
Click to expand...

Definitely.

I was just speaking to people preferring the placement of an individual pedal in different spots. You can’t please everybody.

If you want a do it all mod+space, it makes total sense to design it for the loop.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Blille said:
Definitely.

I was just speaking to people preferring the placement of an individual pedal in different spots. You can’t please everybody.

If you want a do it all mod+space, it makes total sense to design it for the loop.
Click to expand...

Why not to have double outputs and have it programmable/switchable to either?

One of those simple designs that no manufacturer seems to make... another is exp control for parameters
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

I have no doubt that multi-effects will get smaller and easier to incorporate into your rig. Using power supplies, effects in the loop, and effects in the front makes a mountain of cables and takes a bit to set up. And if something goes wrong (like, no sound), it could be any number of things. Not so fun if you are on stage.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Aceman said:
A Pedal called the Duncan ITL

ITL stands for "In the Loop"

This is a Multi-fx with the following:

Modulation, Delay, Reverb. You could use your current awesome algorithms!

Pedal works like this:

Signal: Input>Modulation>Send/rec for adding pedal>Delay>Reverb> Out
Switchable for line/loop levels
Delay has blend for front vs loop loading

Modulation: Chorus, Flanger, Phaser, Tremolo, Vibe, Vibrato - two or three variations of each
Delay: Analog, Tape, Digital, Dotted 8ths, tap
Reverb: Room, Hall, Plate, blah blah blah

All of this stuff Gated or not, tails or not.

150 user programmable spots.

Bonus for global EQ and boost at very end of chain.
Click to expand...

Totally agree -but instead of a pedal -make it a long skinny brick that can attached to the underside of a Marshall or Ampeg top with screws or the bottom of a Fender/Mesa etc and have a wireless pedal controller
 
Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Jacew said:
Why not to have double outputs and have it programmable/switchable to either?

One of those simple designs that no manufacturer seems to make... another is exp control for parameters
Click to expand...

The additional outputs is a tricky one. I would guess that if one cares about moving a pedal around, that may hold true for any pedal so something like a Boss ES-8 ends up being more practical that having dual input/outputs in all the pedals.

Exp control is always a treat. EHX has it quite often but not many others, you’re right.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Mincer said:
I have no doubt that multi-effects will get smaller and easier to incorporate into your rig. Using power supplies, effects in the loop, and effects in the front makes a mountain of cables and takes a bit to set up. And if something goes wrong (like, no sound), it could be any number of things. Not so fun if you are on stage.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily.

I have pedal board with 3 cables going to amp (send, return, input) + to guitar and two separate pedals on top with power cable from board and exp cable + power cable to board.

Thats 7 cables. They're always connected and I just coil them on top of the board in the bag when packing. Take couple of minutes to set all up.
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Blille said:
The additional outputs is a tricky one. I would guess that if one cares about moving a pedal around, that may hold true for any pedal so something like a Boss ES-8 ends up being more practical that having dual input/outputs in all the pedals.

Exp control is always a treat. EHX has it quite often but not many others, you’re right.
Click to expand...

I meant that multi fx should have multiple in/outs to allow different routing of effects. Definitely no point in that for simple pedals
 
Re: Dear SD Designers. Please Make....

Jacew said:
Not necessarily.

I have pedal board with 3 cables going to amp (send, return, input) + to guitar and two separate pedals on top with power cable from board and exp cable + power cable to board.

Thats 7 cables. They're always connected and I just coil them on top of the board in the bag when packing. Take couple of minutes to set all up.
Click to expand...

I color code all of my cables and where they plug into. Takes all of the guess work out of the equation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dystrust
One Rack to Rule Them All
2
Replies
28
Views
1K
NegativeEase
NegativeEase
B
Atomic AmpliFire 3
Replies
0
Views
58
Braciola
B
Aceman
NPD: Zoom G3n
Replies
5
Views
3K
Hank-
H
Back
Top