Though both Def Leppard albums have a distinct style, for sure, it's really the songwriting that made those albums. It sounds like it was just an exhaustive walk-fest working on those albums and they are the very definition of 'over produced'.
I don't know if those albums ever sounded good to me, but they certainly are unique. Everyone has their methods, I guess. It is amazing they got the record companies to go along with it. It would never happen today.
Because of the nature of the way that band played, and the inversions they used, it was very hard to get the right – what Mutt had in his head as – "commercial distortion." We had hundreds of amps and cabinets in that studio; from AC/DC amps, to little combos, to big stacks. Everything you could think of. We spent weeks and weeks trying to get a commercial sound for those inversions, rather than the [raw] crunchy, distorted sound. I'm pretty sure we ended up with just a little Marshall combo amp after we'd tried everything. It's funny, because after a while you get so fatigued that nothing ever sounds good enough. But we had to start recording at a certain point, so we found a good combination that worked, and used condenser mics, [Neumann U] 87s and [Neumann U] 67s, on the amplifiers.
One thing I think the Def Leppard albums fail to achieve is timelessness. They sound *really* of their time. Contrast that with AC/DC.
One thing I think the Def Leppard albums fail to achieve is timelessness. They sound *really* of their time. Contrast that with AC/DC.
and it would be interesting to hear what DL would sound like in a room with their instruments playing through the songs. I bet it would sound great.