Design the world's most versatile guitar

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sirion

Well-known member
The title says it all: you are to design a guitar that can do as many things as possible, and do them well. Money is not an object, but practicality is: go for something that is possible to create, and that doesn't have enormous drawbacks that cancel the positives: A guitar with a built-in Line 6 Helix is practical on paper only.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

I made a guitar that's for me the most versatile I can get. I may tweak this design later but more on that later in this post. First... the pic and specs.

21623986_1534741596565080_1041767576_n.jpg


OK, what we have here is a LP shaped guitar. single piece brazilian rosewood neck, ebony compound radius board (might go for a 25.5'' in a new iteration, this is my fav, though, 24.75''). single piece Limba back, bookmatched maple top.

pickups: stacked p90's of my own design. I can put them in split, series or parallel, each with a unique voice. Split = true p90. Like, for real. The second coil is UNDER the entire mag+baseplate assembly. It's just there for the ride. Parallel: stratty tones. Series: humbucker-ish tones with a bit more sizzle in the top end.

The humbucker is a weird beast. it's a fullshred black winter hybrid triple ceramic. It feels so fluid, tight, agressive and is just a great lead pickup which doesn't hate rhythm either. Think, Steve Vai, Satch, Neil Zaza, etc. Add the middle p90 and it's very classic aerosmith (which wasn't by design, just a happy coincidence). BUT.... I added a blackout modular preamp that I made switchable, for the humbucker alone. Now, with the BMP, it sounds like instant Zakk Wylde and Slayer.

I can go with this guitar from John Mayer/Mark Knopfler to Slayer, in an instant.

Can't get more versatile than this, without compromise, imho.

I might chamber the second version of this guitar, but that will compromise some tones. I MIGHT choose an ash back, that will improve many tones. Small F-Holes and tiny chambers will work visually very well and not inhibit this guitar's ability to handle super-superhigh gain tones.

Oh well... having a workshop of my own is really a chore ;)





_______________________________________________________________________________

Edit: I modded this guitar since this pic was taken (at Jimi's grave, no less ;) ). I ditched the steel saddles and tried out my hand at graphtech: not my thing. I added brass tele saddles and BAM, what a sound. More bite, more sustain and just more tone. THe graphtech really sounds muffled and muddy in comparison. Gone was the teflon nut (what a bi-atch to work with) and hello bone nut. Better tone, better tuning stability.

Other than that, this guitar faded from a purpleish hue to dark blue (like the forum blue here, I've gotta say) and that's about it. I am thinking of sanding this guitar down, recarving the top, adding a tummy cut and doing an other finish down the line, just to make it work better visually. I simply don't like this color and I think I can do a better job with the finish now than three years ago.
 
Last edited:
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

I read the thread title as 'Design The World's Most Compromised Guitar', because that's what it will end up being .... jack of all trades, master of none.

Hah, you only need to look at the forum attempts to design a pickup to know how these things end up.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

I read the thread title as 'Design The World's Most Compromised Guitar', because that's what it will end up being .... jack of all trades, master of none.

Hah, you only need to look at the forum attempts to design a pickup to know how these things end up.

Let us say that I accept your claim: is a jack of all trades necessarily a bad thing? For instance, I don't think that the strat design is the most versatile guitar possible, but its versatility has helped keep it appealing for a good many people.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

Practical for who? You or me?

I read the thread title as 'Design The World's Most Compromised Guitar', because that's what it will end up being .... jack of all trades, master of none.

Hah, you only need to look at the forum attempts to design a pickup to know how these things end up.

I'm going to agree with these two guys about this topic. "Versatility" is a term that is pretty subjective, so what's versatile for you may not be so versatile for me.

The big problem is that there are no pickups that can do everything really well. Even something like the P-Rails (arguably one of the most versatile pickups out there) has limits to what it's good at. Unless you can come up with a PRACTICAL way to rotate pickups in and out of your bridge, center and neck slots ON THE FLY, you're not going to find something that can take care of everything WELL.

That's not to say that you can't come up with extremely versatile guitars, I have one myself. It's just that any versatile guitar is going to be really good at a few things and "good enough" on others.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

Pick a Les Paul, SG, Tele, or Strat. I can do whatever I want with any of them.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

A guitar that comes with Richie Sambora (and a lifetime warranty).
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

There is no such thing.....

If I want a Les Paul....only a Les Paul will do that properly for my ears
If I want a Tele.......only a tele will do that for my ears
If I want a strat.....only a Strat will do that for my ears


etc.

Nobody is the same. Nobody want the same things out of a guitar. Hence this is an impossible ask - even for one person let alone many.
Like your last thread when you were talking about designing a 'better' guitar....I don't think you have really thought it through as it might apply to any other player but yourself.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

I'm going to agree with these two guys about this topic. "Versatility" is a term that is pretty subjective, so what's versatile for you may not be so versatile for me.

The big problem is that there are no pickups that can do everything really well. Even something like the P-Rails (arguably one of the most versatile pickups out there) has limits to what it's good at. Unless you can come up with a PRACTICAL way to rotate pickups in and out of your bridge, center and neck slots ON THE FLY, you're not going to find something that can take care of everything WELL.

Then change bridge type on the fly
Then change scale length on the fly
Then change neck attachment type on the fly too.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

Then change bridge type on the fly
Then change scale length on the fly
Then change neck attachment type on the fly too.

Yeah, I thought of that stuff too but decided not to get into that much detail, opting instead for what I considered to make the biggest overall tonal difference.

You could also talk about wood type, nut, tuners, pot value, strings, frets... the list is practically endless.
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

Here's something I'll bet none of you thought of… If a perfectly versatile guitar COULD be made, we would no longer have an excuse to buy another guitar!

HERESY!!
 
Re: Design the world's most versatile guitar

Okay, I think this thread has had its run, although I can't help but say that I am somewhat disappointed by the responses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top