Differences between Les Paul and Les Paul Junior?

rspst14

Tone Cat
Hey guys anyone know the differences between these two models? Specifically, I'm referring to the older ones made in the 50's. I've been looking for a good project guitar, and I came across this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7312083029&fromMakeTrack=true

It needs a lot of work, most of which seems to be cosmetic. It appears to be structurally sound and could be one hell of a score if it works out for me. It'll probably sell for more than I'm willing to pay, but just in case I get lucky, how would a 50's Junior differ from a regular Les Paul? I know many of the Junior models have P90's, are there other major differences? Thanks.

Ryan
 
Re: Differences between Les Paul and Les Paul Junior?

I won't get them all, but:
Junior/LP
Mahogany/mahogany w/ maple cap (most of them)
One P90/two humbuckers (big diff)
The bridges are different too. I always forget which one is called which.

That auction scares me.
 
Re: Differences between Les Paul and Les Paul Junior?

Falstaff said:
That auction scares me.

Haha, maybe so, but if by some miracle the bidding stays low, it would be one hell of a nice score as far as project guitars go. I've been looking for an LP project, but even busted-ass Norlin era LP's are fetching $1500. :wrf:

Besides, the quality is probably better than the current LP models. :ban:

Ryan
 
Re: Differences between Les Paul and Les Paul Junior?

The LP Junior was a poor man's version of a LP, no binding or other frills, flat top instead of carved. That guitar is ruined valuewise, a pity really. It won't be a miracle at all if the bidding stays low, I wouldn't pay that for it.
 
Re: Differences between Les Paul and Les Paul Junior?

Jr's had no binding, dot inlays, cheep keys, P-90's, painted on Logo's, no maple top, etc...IMO even if it is a "real" 56 it's already too overpriced. The best thing about the one in your link is that being a 56 it should have a nice big fat neck!
 
Back
Top