So it comes down to a head to head between these two PU's.
Whichever one I pick will be used in the bridge position of my Les Paul Studio, tuned to C#.
At the moment, I`m swaying towards the Dimarzio, here are the specs:
Dimarzio D-Activator (DP220)
Magnet: Ceramic
Output: 470
D.C Resistance: 11.41
Guitar World has a award for this pickup, and a good review. The sound quality is @ss though. The main thing I`m interested in is clarity and definition which this pickup has in spades.
It was designed from a brief by Ibanez for it's Xiphos guitars. They wanted a passive PU with the characteristics of an active - and I think they nailed it. The guitarist from Necrophargist uses them, and the tone is still really focused and organic to my ears. It might not be my type of music, but I think this PU may really shine in my LP.
Do any Duncan users have any more feedback? Or has anyone used the Dimarzio atall?
Whichever one I pick will be used in the bridge position of my Les Paul Studio, tuned to C#.
At the moment, I`m swaying towards the Dimarzio, here are the specs:
Dimarzio D-Activator (DP220)
Magnet: Ceramic
Output: 470
D.C Resistance: 11.41
Guitar World has a award for this pickup, and a good review. The sound quality is @ss though. The main thing I`m interested in is clarity and definition which this pickup has in spades.
It was designed from a brief by Ibanez for it's Xiphos guitars. They wanted a passive PU with the characteristics of an active - and I think they nailed it. The guitarist from Necrophargist uses them, and the tone is still really focused and organic to my ears. It might not be my type of music, but I think this PU may really shine in my LP.
Do any Duncan users have any more feedback? Or has anyone used the Dimarzio atall?