Well, to be honest, spacing only matters for looks. A trembucker will work in a Les Paul just as well as a PAF would, and same in a Floyd Rose loaded guitar. It's really just the pole peices lining up, and sometimes trembuckers are wound hotter than standard spaced buckers.
Then why can guys like Lew and I hear a difference? Just because some people can´t hear (or don´t think they hear) a difference doesn´t mean there isn´t one
The way to measure, that Duncan has noted since day 1 of the trembucker: strings <2" center to center @ bridge = No TB
Strings 2" or more at bridge = TB
I was gonna say, your pole-pole spacing is 52mm, and trembuckers are 52mm. I'd go F-spaced.
My tremspaced C5 should be arriving today or early next week, to replace a regular one in a guitar that has a volume issue with the two E strings. As soon as I get it in, I'll tell you if it makes a difference.
Then why can guys like Lew and I hear a difference? Just because some people can´t hear (or don´t think they hear) a difference doesn´t mean there isn´t one
The way to measure, that Duncan has noted since day 1 of the trembucker: strings <2" center to center @ bridge = No TB
Strings 2" or more at bridge = TB
I should've thrown in an IMO, or a to my ears. I've had a trembucker in a TOM and a standard bucker in a Floyd'ed axe, and couldn't hear a difference from the proper spaced pickup.
One thing that a lot of guys also forget is that even trem bridges can vary a bit as far as string spacing goes, T-O-Ms as well because the string slots are filed by hand.....I´ve actually seen both with strings so far apart that they were almost outside the poles on a TB (esp. with some of the wacko Imprt hardware that´s out there)...and on one of those I GUARANTEE you´ll hear a difference without one