Gibson ES339 Review

phil_104

Cheesesteakologist
Feautures of note :
Solid center maple block
Laminated front, back, sides
30-60 neck profile
57 classic and 57 classic plus pickups
“Memphis tone circuit”
Side mounted jack

Author’s note:
In the spirit of remaining transparent, please note that this guitar was bought on the fly, with no prior research, or preconcieved notion of the guitar. I use it as part of my guitar stable, along side a strat, gretsch, les paul, and a few acoustics. I do have a bias towards Gibson guitars; I have three, and I dig them, that’s no secret. I’ve only ever played this guitar through a Fender Blues Jr ltd edition with Jensen speaker and sparkle mod. I’ve had it for a couple of weeks now, and I’ve ran it through the paces.

Construction and body style :
The ES339’s distinguishing feature is it’s smaller body. A tad bigger than a Les Paul, it is considerably smaller than an ES335, and has a solid maple block down the middle of the guitar. For me, this was the reason to get into ES style guitars, as the 335 had never felt comfortable, was a little dark, and I struggled with feedback when playing those. The feedback is considerably reduced, the guitar feels more comfortable to play standing up, and the overall tone is very different; punchier and more defined, while retaining the woody and airy nature of a semi hollow. In my opinion, the body and style of this guitar would be geared more towards rock players, where a 335 would be more suited towards blues and jazz styles. The focus works well for such a style, but blues and jazz players might prefer a bigger body with a more predominant low end.

Neck profile:
I’ve been fortunate enough to have the opportunity to play many Gibson neck profiles, from the beefier one on my LP Trad, to the neck of my J45, the 60s neck on a 61ri SG I had on loan from a friend for about 4 months this summer, to the big, gigantic 50s neck profile on my friend’s ES339. Out of all the Gibson necks I have played, the 30-60 is probably the most comfortable shape I have encountered. It retains the quickness of the 60s neck, whit adding just a touch of girth that allows the hand to rest comfortably during more complex chords. I sorta wish my Les Paul had such a neck. The 50s neck on these models are not bad if you like big necks, but they are by far the largest carve I have seen. Ever.

Electronics
It’s almost like Gibson made this guitar for me, including the excellent 57 classic set. In my opinion, the finest pickup they make. If you are not familiar with it, do yourself a favor and try it out. It’s also the set I have in my Les Paul, and I don’t feel the need to change them out what so ever. The guitar also features a “memphis tone circuit”, which is essentially fancy wire trickery, that makes it so your high end doesn’t roll off with your volume. It’s actually, really, really cool.

Finish
It’s a Gibson; thus be warned. I’ve seen a few really bad ones. I wanted an all black one they had there, but the binding wasn’t super hot, specially on the edges of the fretboard. This one is pretty decent though. Nice deep red finish, with nice wood grain, and no finish flaws that I can find. It's a nice deep red, not the overly bright red you often see. I think they call it Antique Red. I always feel like when I get a new Gibson though, the finish is sticky until I play the damn thing for a half a year. I dunno, I might just be picky, but the finish always feels a little bit sticky, but that eventually settles down.

Hardware.
Pretty standard here. Some people hate the tuners. Be warned though; without a proper tech setup, this guitar pinched the G string like mad. A set up (like with any new guitar imho), is required. Not a big fan of Gibson nuts to start with, but it could be worst.

Overall impression.
Overall I am very impressed. This is, in my opinion, THE best bang for buck Gibson out on the market, save maybe the LP Trad. It’s a CS guitar, at the 2k price range, new, which is difficult to beat. I searched long and hard for my perfect LP, and this one was more of an impulse buy ; they had 4 in stock, I got the best one. Even at that, I do notice a difference between the regular Gibson line, and the CS. The custom shop seems to have higher standards in terms of finishing, and general build. The guitar, overall, feels old. I’ve had a few friends play it, and this keeps coming up. It’s a very traditional feeling instrument, with a very new approach to the design for modern players. If you are a modern player, influenced by the 50s-60s-70s who’s trying to get his own sound, this might be a guitar to look into. This is probably going to become my #1 guitar.

Pros :
- Great Price
- Classic sounds, great electronics
- New spin on a classic that will appeal to those wanting a more compact guitar, for more modern sounds, without sacrificing the old school vibe.
- Custom shop quality

Cons :
- Walking the line : the guitar tries to be a just middle between the LP and 335. It’s amazign if you dig it, but some will find they would just rather play either a LP, which has more focus, on 335, which has a more open and lose sound. It might be trying to compromise to much.
- Some really dislike the tuners, and the fact that it was in bad need of a setup doesn’t help when it comes to tuning stability. I did find that with a good setup though, no issues occurred, even during longer sets.
- Don’t expect zero feedback with super heavy distortion; it is still a semi-hollow (this shouldn’t be a con, it’s more like an
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Great review man.

I always feel like when I get a new Gibson though, the finish is sticky until I play the damn thing for a half a year. I dunno, I might just be picky, but the finish always feels a little bit sticky, but that eventually settles down.
I always just leave mine out on a stand for a couple of weeks and that always cures them right up.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Great review man.


I always just leave mine out on a stand for a couple of weeks and that always cures them right up.

Thanks man.

That's what I also end up doing. This is, I live in a very, very humid corner of the world, so it takes a tad longer. Just always seems like they need to settle in once I get them. Not a big issue.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Gibson-ES-339.jpg


es339b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

The ES-339 is the modern classic Gibson, and I hope history reflects it. It's the only guitar I have on my mind, although I'm totally satisfied with my ES-335.

I normally like 50's necks or chunky C's, but my ES-335 is the only 60's neck I've bonded with, probably because it's a very comfortable shape. It could have to do with the fact that it rides higher in your lap, so the closer neck feels good in the slimmer profile.
 
Nice review. I've been loving my 339 since i got it a year ago or so. Mine has the 59 neck, and i don't know what the memphis tone circuit is, since mine came with wolfetones in it when i got it.

I do wonder about is what exactly is mean by the "custom shop" thing, though. The gibson custom shop everyone thinks about is in Nashville, but the 339 is made in memphis with the other semi-hollows.

I will say this - the 339 isn't a les paul OR a 335. It's its own thing. For me with my band, it's perfect. You get that bloom and woodyness to the tone, but the feedback factor is very manageable and relatively easy to control.

Great score, man. That's a killer guitar. Play it in good health!
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

I own several Les Pauls, an ES-335, and recently (Last year) purchased an ES-339.

You review is spot on!

The ES-339 is a joy to play, feels like butter in my hands, and has tone somewhat between the lester and 335, but still one of its own.

I did not like the bridge and changed it to Callaham's ABR replacement bridge.

The Kluson tuners had to be sweetened to remove small burrs on the G and B strings, but that was it.

I purchase mine with the antique vintage sunburst color and with the 59 neck profile instead of the 30/60 neck profile. Which neck profile and color is yours?
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Excellent review, thanks for that. One of these (or an old Ibanez small bodied semi - AM series I think) is on my to get list.... so one day.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Great review... I think most of your review was spot on! I elected go with a 359. My 359 was hand picked off the Gibson floor. Its a killer guitar. And to be honest I am not sure whether I love my 335 or my 359 more. here is a pic of mine. I've had it a few years now and I agree it takes a bit of playing it until the finish starts to feel natural. The basic difference is the 339 is a smaller version of a 335, the 359 is a smaller version of the 355. It has all custom appointments.
picture.php
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Thanks guys, I think it's an interesting guitar. Worth playing if you can get your hands on one.

I purchase mine with the antique vintage sunburst color and with the 59 neck profile instead of the 30/60 neck profile. Which neck profile and color is yours?

I have the 30-60 neck, in Antique Red.

Bludave, that guitar.... wow
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Nice review. I've been loving my 339 since i got it a year ago or so. Mine has the 59 neck, and i don't know what the memphis tone circuit is, since mine came with wolfetones in it when i got it.

I do wonder about is what exactly is mean by the "custom shop" thing, though. The gibson custom shop everyone thinks about is in Nashville, but the 339 is made in memphis with the other semi-hollows.

I will say this - the 339 isn't a les paul OR a 335. It's its own thing. For me with my band, it's perfect. You get that bloom and woodyness to the tone, but the feedback factor is very manageable and relatively easy to control.

Great score, man. That's a killer guitar. Play it in good health!

Agreed that the guitar is it's own thing. And yes, it does seem just perfect in a band setting for me also. Great tones in this guitar.

I also do not know what the "custom shop" thing is. It comes stamped at the back of the neck with the logo, has the CS case, and a certificate of authenticity. I have no idea what so ever what that is about. I don't know if it's a different process, a different crew working on the guitar; I just don't know. I do know the guitar has a different feel about it than the other guitar I've had in terms of finish and overall vibe, but that's not very objective in assessing it's quality, lol.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Man, I want one of those so badly. I played one through a hot rod deluxe, and it truly blew me away.

By the way, I think it's perfect for jazz and blues (what I like to play). I like the fact it doesn't sound like everyone's guitar.

I'm $800 away from owning one!
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Man, I want one of those so badly. I played one through a hot rod deluxe, and it truly blew me away.

By the way, I think it's perfect for jazz and blues (what I like to play). I like the fact it doesn't sound like everyone's guitar.

I'm $800 away from owning one!

Do it!

I agree that it's a good guitar for blues, but what I meant in my review is that it might not be what blues and jazz players have come to expect from a 335 tonally, with simply a smaller body. I know to my ears, for jazz, I'd want more low end, with a looser sound. The definition of the 339 could be an asset though.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

I've been interested in one of these for a while; I'd really like to see a review comparing the ES-339 with the CS-336, which is a similar size but AFAIK has a carved/chambered mahogany body instead of laminated maple.

I also noticed that Ibanez has issued some new AM models, but they are not available outside the USA.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Do it!

I agree that it's a good guitar for blues, but what I meant in my review is that it might not be what blues and jazz players have come to expect from a 335 tonally, with simply a smaller body. I know to my ears, for jazz, I'd want more low end, with a looser sound. The definition of the 339 could be an asset though.

Yeah, I think I was mainly just jonesing on the uniqueness of the sound. It's still Gibson-y, but harder to nail down. It had a little more "sparkle" than a 335, which I thought would be great for jazzy lines.

Now that I typed "sparkle", I think that is what makes it unique as opposed to an lp or a 335. The word "bright" doesn't quite do it justice, because it doesn't convey the positive enough.

You can see I really want this thing!
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

Construction and body style :
The ES339’s distinguishing feature is it’s smaller body. A tad bigger than a Les Paul, it is considerably smaller than an ES335, and has a solid maple block down the middle of the guitar. For me, this was the reason to get into ES style guitars, as the 335 had never felt comfortable, was a little dark, and I struggled with feedback when playing those. The feedback is considerably reduced, ...

You get that bloom and woodyness to the tone, but the feedback factor is very manageable and relatively easy to control.


You know, I had heard time and time again about feedback issues with 335s and that was the number one thing I was worried about when I bought mine. But I have to ask, knowing both of you have either played or owned bigger bodied semi-hollowbodies, was it really that big of an issue for you? And if so, what were you playing through? The reason I ask is that, while my 335 will feedback (very controllable, mind you), it hasn't been near as bad as I expected. And I play through an Uberschall. At pretty loud volumes. Is it only at stage levels of volume that you experienced this (which I am close to approaching now)? Or were you particularly close to the amp? I'm wondering if I should expect different results should I start playing live.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

You know, I had heard time and time again about feedback issues with 335s and that was the number one thing I was worried about when I bought mine. But I have to ask, knowing both of you have either played or owned bigger bodied semi-hollowbodies, was it really that big of an issue for you? And if so, what were you playing through? The reason I ask is that, while my 335 will feedback (very controllable, mind you), it hasn't been near as bad as I expected. And I play through an Uberschall. At pretty loud volumes. Is it only at stage levels of volume that you experienced this (which I am close to approaching now)? Or were you particularly close to the amp? I'm wondering if I should expect different results should I start playing live.

Yeah, I've owned bigger hollowbodies. At the time, I was playing a Blues Deluxe, now I play a Blues Jr, but I was fortunate enough to play the 339 through the very same BD (my friend owns it) that I had last week.

There is a significant difference in my opinion. I use pretty high gain pedals for distortion, and I think the difference can be felt. It's hard to quantify "managing" feedback, but the best way I can explain it would be to say that I feel like I can give my sound more low end punch with this guitar. It's hard to put into words to be honest, wish I know is not much help. With something like a 335, you can control feedback, with the 339, I don't feel I have to.

With that said, I wouldn't steer away from a 335 because of the feedback. It's totally, totally manageable. The 339 is just effortless.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

I own both a 359 & a 335. the feedback is more of an issue with the 335. I have my sound holes stuffed to minimize it & it really does depend on how loud you play & how much gain you play with. I am pretty much a blues/blues-rock kind of player. I don't use an excessive amount of gain but more overdrive. Usually I can play at the volume I like to with minimal issues. The 359 being smaller has less issues then the 335 does. they are both manageable but in some rooms where the stage is tight it may present a problem as the where you will stand in relation to where your amp is.
 
Re: Gibson ES339 Review

I never really had a feedback issue with my 345, and we played very loud (Bandmaster dimed with LPB-1 booster near max, played thru 2 2x12 boxes with JBL D120s).
 
Back
Top