Gibson files to cancel DiMarzio’s PAF and Double Cream pickup trademarks

Jfc, Gibson would make a lot more money, if they didn't waste so much on lawyers and filing fees.

The market share they gain back by preventing people from using their designs and closing their competitors far outweighs the legal costs. They are likely recouping court costs and legal fees as part of the suit along with lost revenue. Do you really think if it were a waste of money Gibson would spend decades and millions suing people? I might argue the suits are one of the most dependable cashflows feeding their bottom line.
 
If Gibson wins the lawsuit, does that mean that they'll be the only ones allowed to make double cream pickups?
 
Good, those foos Dmz. From the article:

At the time of the filings, DiMarzio was aware that Gibson was the owner of double-cream design and the PAF term in relation to pickups. Therefore it committed fraud on the US trademark office when it filed for the two trademarks.

Foos
 
While I don't care enough about the issue to write an essay on a public internet forum during work hours, I think the term "PAF" has become generic enough that they will drop the trademark, I don't think they will drop the double cream trademark because at least in my eye, they have defended it well enough that no one else has tried with any success to use it. In all my years of looking at guitars, I have only ever seen in person a single double cream pickup that wasn't DiMarzio, and that was an actual PAF.

They could defend it quite a bit just off the grounds that for the longest time you could 100% say any double cream double hex pickup was a Super Distortion, and that's still a pretty safe bet to make today.
 
Modern guitar players would rather do anything instead of practice, even argue trademark law.
Guitar playing is not all about practicing. It's not like we're not allowed to have fun and interact with others. Not because someone doesn't become the next Yngwie mean they can't be happy playing guitar.
 
Last edited:
There is no doubt that Gibson wastes a tremendous amount of time, money and mind share on legalese...

But if any other company had to get ability to file this suit, it would be logical, so this is one of the few times, in recent history, where I think Gibson is actually doing something intelligent.

Of course, they could be using the time and money for R&D to develop new products and markets that would pay off in a long haul, but it appears that say are better at filing lawsuits.
 
Back
Top