Grizzly_Diesel
New member
so ive been seeing more and more of these guitars without headstocks? personally it's not my cup of tea. whats the benefit, if any other than looks?
Nothing to break off. Rather than look for a "benefit", try appreciating it for what it is: a different way of building.
so ive been seeing more and more of these guitars without headstocks? personally it's not my cup of tea. whats the benefit, if any other than looks?
I've been thinking about getting a Carvin Kiesel headless lately. The only flaw, and it's a BIG one, is that they don't have a trem at all, just a fixed bridge with tuning keys. Although I don't use the trem to extremes, I do often use it for chord shimmers and occasional accents on notes for lead, so I'd hate to to miss out. EVH made extremely good use of the Steinberger TransTrem on the 5150 album (Get Up and Summer Nights). Love how you can change the pitch of entire chords in tune!
There is something very special about the feel of a headless guitar, and they can look very cool with a partial Strat body. I'll probably pick up a Kiesel after they finally add a TransTrem option. I've heard that open and fretted notes sounds very similar on a headless guitar, which is different also. Different is good.
One thing to consider with headless guitars (especially if they have the tiny square Steinberger body) is that they can look very odd on you if you are a big/tall guy. So you might want try one in person before buying if that matters at all to you. :blackeye:
Nothing to break off.
@Mincer. Have you ever tried a Klein headless guitar? If so, how did it compare to the Steinberger L and M series?
The Alan Holdsworth model that Keisel makes has a trem on it. I was that their factory store in San Diego in October and to my surprise, I liked the AH model the most. The Vader was ok- very compact.
