Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

UberMetalDood

New member
Before I offer at review, I need to point a couple of things out. Though I've finally settled very well on my gear as far as guitars, pickups, pedals, and Ecstasy 101B is concerned, I'm up in the air about which 2nd main amp to keep. Here's the deal... I borrowed a friend's pre-2008 Quick Rod back in 2007. Then in 2009, I bought a new Quick Rod. I also bought a Nitro w/EL34's. I loved both amps, but had an itch for Bogners and decided to give Bogner a ride before deciding to go back to Splawn. I loved the Nitro that I had. I tried the KT88 version and it was great too, but I preferred the EL34 version because it had a better midrange and the right amount of low end (I opted for regular EL34's instead of EL34B's). My Quick Rod was great too. I had nothing to complain about the Quick Rod, except that it took on kind of a dry, unforgiving feel once the tubes got all warmed up. The truth, as I later came to realize, was that my technique needed some improvement.

Fast forward to this past Thursday when my new Quick Rod showed up at my door. Its golden attributes gleaming from inside of the box, and its rugged housing built to rumble and roar. I pulled the beautiful beast from the box and played my Les Paul until the strings wore out. What astonishes me is the clean channel. I do not remember the Quick Rod EVER having such a beautiful clean channel. There has to be something different because this clean channel rivals my Goldfinger 90, and that amp has incredible cleans. The clean channel loves pedals as much as a Port City Pearl does.

It takes some adjusting to get the low-gain and mid-gain tones because it quickly goes into modded plexi and beyond, but those tones are definitely there - especially if you boost the clean channel. I've been using an Eminence Man'O'War, and although I like the speaker, it has never sounded so good. What sounds even better is when it plugged my QR into a Private Jack.

There is so much gain available, but what makes the Quick Rod so outstanding is that it has such an incredible feel for soloing. One of the biggest reasons why I love the 101B is its unique and incredibly great feel. The Goldfinger also has a great feel. You don't even need to use your right hand to play because it responds so well to your finger tips.

I would be remiss if I didn't mention the outstanding harmonics the Quick Rod gives up. Oh man does it scream, squeal and squeak. You can pretty much get artificial harmonics anywhere on the fretboard, and you don't even need to have the gain past noon.

The actual sound, EQ, and overall tone of the Quick Rod is VERY, VERY much Marshall. However, it's a bit warmer and the top end doesn't get out of control when it gets gainy. It's probably a bit darker than a DSL or JVM I think. In fact, it reminds me a lot of a Blackstar Series One 100 with the ISF favoring the British side. It's a weird thing that it doesn't let you switch from gear 1 to gear 3. It only allows from gear 1 to 2, or from gear 2 to 3. That's a bit disappointing because Gear 1 makes the perfect rhythm channel, and it would be cool if you could switch to Gear 3 for searing, saturated solos. However, Gear 2 has plenty of gain for me.

Between the channels, there is not much difference except in gain. Gear 1 has a bit less low end, Gear 2 has a bit more low end and a little more upper mids. Gear 3 has a little more low mids. The tone controls seem to stay effective even when the amp is roaring very loudly.

I can't end this review without mentioning the effects loop master volume which is like a 2nd master volume. It lets the amp give you the saturation you would get if it were cranked but at pretty much any volume. It really does work well. I still think the Blackstar Series One Dynamic Power Reduction is slightly more effective, but you definitely can't complain about how well the QR FX master works.

Of course all Splawns come equipped with a 1/2 power switch. Right now, mine is set for home use which is set to 1/2 power, effects loop master around 9:00, and channel volume around 11:00. It's just loud enough that way to keep my guitar strings from coming through when recording. It has a couple of sweet spots for louder playing, but you don't need to look for sweet spots like on a vintage amp because the loop master works so well.

Lastly, I should mention that the FX loop is great. It doesn't do anything that my ears can perceive to the tone. I use effects subtly, but it seems to work well with heavy effects so I have no doubt that it can accommodate a robust pedal board.

One last note about the FX loop leads me back to the clean channel. I remember both my 2009 QR and Nitro both with good clean channels but needing just a hint of chorus or reverb to sound great. This Quick Rod, however, has such a nice clean channel that you can play it all the time without needing any kind of modulation. You would think on such a high gain amp that the clean channel wouldn't be as dynamic, but it is. I can noodle quietly and strike notes harder for louder volume. The absolute best cleans I have ever heard on an amp was my Ecstasy 20th anniversary (6L6). The Quick Rod isn't that good, but it isn't in need of any improvement whatsoever.

I have seen reviews where people refer to the Quick Rod as a one-trick-pony, or the clean channel as merely decent, but I couldn't disagree more. One consideration that I had when deciding to buy it was that I remember the Nitro being smoother. However, it doesn't need to be any smoother. It's the perfect blend of Marshall crunch and smoothness. It's not smooth and smoky as a Bogner Shiva, or even as refined as a Goldfinger, but it's slightly warmer and smoother than a high gain Marshall. The QR definitely offers a great deal more than just high gain. It's not a hi-fi sound in the Quick Rod, but it can lend itself to thrash extremely well. I would say the Nitro has a bit of hi-fi'ness to it and probably handles scooped death metal a little better. I have my QR sitting on top of a Dual Rectifier Multi-Watt which, as you know, is one of the best metal amps you can possibly get. I think the QR can keep up with it in the thrash department probably 90%.

The QR is not bassy. In fact, it has less bass than my Goldfinger 90, so I have to run the bass control past noon to get deep, heavy sounds. However, I generally don't like too much bass so it's perfect for me.

I'm pretty much now evaluating whether I keep the Quick Rod and sell my Goldfinger 90, or possibly go back to a Blackstar Series One 100 because I really miss that amp. The only way I will be able to decide is by spending another couple of weeks with my QR and also directly comparing it with a Series One. Considering that it's so good and has a lifetime warranty, it's the top contender right now. I'm also considering selling my Dual Rect to get a Series One, but then I'd have 3 Marshall style EL34 amps. I'm not really sure at this point. all I know is that the Quick Rod is a ton of fun to play.

By the way, I spend some time looking around the Internet and Splawn forum for Quick Rod pictures before deciding on the cab/tolex/color style to go with. Splawn hasn't made this particular combination of black and gold with the cab type so mine is a little bit unique which is cool because I don't like being like other people :)

20131116_230302_zpsbafb3741.jpg
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Great review, I enjoyed that. Have you ever played a Stielleto Deuce II? I am wndering how tight the gain structure of that Splawn is, becasue I think the deuce II has a switch for a tube or silicon rectifier, and the tube gives some of that old skool 'sag'.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Great review, I enjoyed that. Have you ever played a Stielleto Deuce II? I am wndering how tight the gain structure of that Splawn is, becasue I think the deuce II has a switch for a tube or silicon rectifier, and the tube gives some of that old skool 'sag'.

Yeah definitely. I am very familiar with them. I love the Stiletto Deuce (100w) the most, then the Ace (50w). I'm not a fan of the Trident (150w). I once bought a used Stiletto Deuce (100w) from Guitar Center but it had a problem so I swapped it for a used Steletto Ace. I thought the Deuce was a little darker and a bit more controllable in the treble frequency than the Ace. However, at the time I was using Black Shadow speakers which are not as harsh as G12T75's, but just as bright. I realized later on that the Ace sounded way better with Greenbacks and G12 Heritage speaker, but hindsight is always 20/20. The only reason I took the Ace back was because I planned on buying one new so I could get a warranty, but for some reason I never went back.

The Stilettos have AWESOME cleans. On man and the crunch and lead modes are incredible. I personally thought crunch FELT very dry. I had to use an overdrive to boost it, and the tube rectified setting was preferable. High-gain mode was a lot of fun to play. Even though it's an EL34 amp, they somehow managed to give the Stiletto the signature Mesa Boogie mid dip. It has lots of low and high mids, but scooped right in the middle to my ears. Some people might not get along with that if they're used to traditional British mids, but it has not problem cutting through. The Ace has a presence that can't quite be dialed out, but if you ask me, you would lose some of that natural British flavor if you tried to warm the highs too much.

Speaker selection is definitely a factor with the Stiletto. I think the Stiletto gets criticized a lot by people who use it with the stock Mesa Boogie speakers. Overall it's a truly great amp and it's a shame that Mesa Boogie discontinued them. I wouldn't have cared if they discontinued the Trident, but the Ace and Deuce will be missed. Mesa Boogie also discontinued the Electra Dyne, and that was a really good amp. Fortunately, the Royal Atlantic does everything both the Stiletto AND Electra Dyne could do minus the exact same sounds. However, it has a real British flavor even with 6L6's.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

This is the problem with owning a Bogner Ecstasy. It's the perfect EL-34 amp, and you won't find anything that overlaps without the XTC killing it.

So then, your only options are amps that have exquisite tone that the XTC doesn't quite nail down. Different tube types is the best way to do that. The XTC has been my main amp for years, but I always keep other amps around that skirt around it, tone-wise. Different Marshalls, Fenders, Gibsons, Matchless etc.

The tone quest is a fun ride. There's no question about it. Guitar amplification is something very unique to our tiny little place in the history of the universe. To dabble in it and have fun is one of life's little joys.

That Splawn looks like a bunch of good Marshall tones that are probably a tiny bit crunchier than what the XCT dishes out....being slightly more compressed and low mid heavy.
 
Last edited:
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Great review there, glad to see there's more of us happy Splawn owners around! :D

I have a 2009/2010 (I forget which) Quick Rod with the FX loop Master control and also quite like the clean channel for the type of amp that this is.

I've never used my QR with Greenback style speakers, I tend to use 2x12s so they're not really an option wattage wise, but you've made me want to track down a 4x12 with them and give it a blast!

As regards keeping more than 1 amp around I've found my QRs perfect mate in my 6L6GC loaded SLO clone.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Lovely amp. I really dig the dryness and articulation.

But I wanna get a Nitro one day.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Your not helping my splawn gas go away. Maybe after Christmas I'll save up for one.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

BUGGER . . . the review is of such nature . . . I WANT ONE TOO NOW !

Damn U UMD !!!

Great Review . . . and HNAD to you mate !

PS : wee need more pix as soon as you got everything hooked up and ready to rock !
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Congrats!!! I love my QR too! Only thing is, my chops are sloppy and it definately works better for an accomplished player! But that bark that it puts out is blissful!

 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

So, how does it compare to the 800, "and any variant of said 800?

Details of said comparison would be greatly appreciated.

In other words... What makes it stand out in the, Marshall, scheme of things?

Could you give little more detail other than, amazing, or awesome?
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

I have a modded JCM 800. Its been a long time that Ive played them back to back or together. (When I did run them both, I had an Eargasm!!!) The QR has a wider pallet of tones and more gain. And more low end grunt. Its more of a modded JCM800 than a normal JCM800. (in Gear 2, which is suppossed to be closest to a JCM800.) Gear 3 goes way beyond. My JCM has a mod that the last part of the gain sweep is supposed to be more like a Jubilee, not the typical "jose" type mod..
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Thanks. I'm glad you guys liked my review. I've been working a lot on my rhythm playing lately so I'll try to follow up my review with a good quality audio sample.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

So, how does it compare to the 800, "and any variant of said 800?

Details of said comparison would be greatly appreciated.

In other words... What makes it stand out in the, Marshall, scheme of things?

Could you give little more detail other than, amazing, or awesome?
In my experience the Marshall is more "open" and the Splawn more "compressed". Also the Splawn sounds great at lower volumes, the 800 needs to be cooking to sound as good. (Plus the aforementioned gain, the Splawn's gain knob sweeps *much* wider especially with the 3 gears)
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

So, how does it compare to the 800, "and any variant of said 800?

Details of said comparison would be greatly appreciated.

In other words... What makes it stand out in the, Marshall, scheme of things?

Could you give little more detail other than, amazing, or awesome?
In my experience the Marshall is more "open" and the Splawn more "compressed". Also the Splawn sounds great at lower volumes, the 800 needs to be cooking to sound as good. (Plus the aforementioned gain, the Splawn's gain knob sweeps *much* wider especially with the 3 gears) Also the Splawn is articulate, hence the need for clean technique.
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

Good point! The JCM is made to be played WFO! Also, on the newer QRs, you can use the loop volume as a master to get the tone at lower volumes too. Just have to remember to go back to the front panel when playing at higher volumes or you'll get a bad flubby tone. I thought something was wrong with mine cuz I was getting a bad noise at high volume, but finally realized I had the loop volume on too. duh!!
 
Re: Holy NAD! You thought you knew........

So, how does it compare to the 800, "and any variant of said 800?

Details of said comparison would be greatly appreciated.

In other words... What makes it stand out in the, Marshall, scheme of things?

Could you give little more detail other than, amazing, or awesome?

I did. In fact, I referenced probably 7 or 8 other well known amps. What else do you want me to say other than it's a slightly refined sounding modded Marshall with a great clean channel? All i can tell you, starting with the clean channel, is that it's warm (but not dark) and modern (a little bit hi-fi, not completely a classic voicing). It's not a dry, sterile clean tone like a Marshall JVM. It's also not a loose and sparkly tone like a Fender. I suppose it's a relatively bright amp if you compare it to an Ecstasy 101B or Mesa Boogie, so it has some sparkle, but it's relatively thick with a mid focus that's not too up front for a good clean tone. Gear 1 = hot plexi, gear 2 = hot JCM800, gear 3 = modded JCM800. There is a slight mid shift that I detect from gear 1 to gear 3 that spreads a bit from mid to low and high, but not scooped. Gear 1 pretty much makes a great rhythm tone or blues lead, but capable of much more on lower gain settings. Gear 2 is pretty much any kind of boosted JCM800 sound. Gear 3 is the highest gain and kind of leans a little towards an AFD kind of sound. That's pretty much how I'd describe it in detail at this point.

I have a modded JCM 800. Its been a long time that Ive played them back to back or together. (When I did run them both, I had an Eargasm!!!) The QR has a wider pallet of tones and more gain. And more low end grunt. Its more of a modded JCM800 than a normal JCM800. (in Gear 2, which is suppossed to be closest to a JCM800.) Gear 3 goes way beyond. My JCM has a mod that the last part of the gain sweep is supposed to be more like a Jubilee, not the typical "jose" type mod..

I can agree with your description of Gear 2, and that Gear 3 does not have the typical Jose mod. Gear 3 kind of reminds me of a Hughes and Kettner Triamp MKII on the high gain channel/amp for some reason though the Triamp has a more unique sound.
 
Back
Top