Jazz ceramic = EMG 60 (Almost!)

Sun King

New member
So I picked up this used Jackson SLSMG Soloist as a "project" guitar- I love that thin, compound-radius neck, but the hardware and wiring all needed replacement. It came with EMG 81/81, but so far I've tried several variations of Duncan Distortion and Custom in the bridge, paired up with a Jazz neck. I was curious about the EMGs though, and ultimately put a 60 in the neck and 81 back in the bridge.

It didn't take long to decide that I like the Custom 8 in the bridge way better, but that EMG 60 in the neck just sounded great. I wanted to go back to passive Duncans but hated to give up that 60.

I searched for info on any passive "EMG 60 equivalent", and came up with very little info, but did find a few references to the Jazz, and ceramic magnets. So I decided to find out for myself...

I threw in a Ceramic 8 from Addiction-FX. It works! One thing about the EMG 60 though, is that it has a very balanced output. Whether playing higher on the neck, and/or wound strings vs the plain, it's very "even", never boomy (I think that's how you describe it?) like the Jazz gets when playing the wound strings (E/A/D) on the dirty channel. So I ended up putting in hex poles for the three wound strings, raising them a bit, then lowering the pickup body on that bass side. Now, the Ceramic Jazz sounds very, very close to the EMG 60, and can pretty well nail the Master of Puppets tone when played on the dirty channel. With the hex poles, and lowered bass side, the output is also very even on all strings, with very little boominess. I'm really happy with the way this experiment turned out, and I should be able to ditch the EMGs for good.

I will qualify this by saying that this little test was conducted on the Jazz neck in my LTD, since the EMGs were still in the Jackson and I wasn't quite ready to gamble with taking them out, until I knew this might work. (Eh, I'm just lazy and tired of rewiring pickups lately!) But I've had Jazz pups in the neck of both guitars, and they've sounded pretty consistent. I will say that on the clean channel, the Jazz Ceramic is extremely bright, but a little twist of the tone knob solves that. The Jackson is all mahogany so if anything it should sound even better in there, since the LTD is lighter and brighter in general.

So maybe this has been done before, but since I hadn't found much info on it, I decided it wouldn't hurt to experiment. Plus it might benefit someone down the road, and/or add to available reference material on pickups and mag swaps. Ultimately I'll probably switch the Jazz in my LTD back to the stock mag, but since the Jackson will be more metal-focused, the Jazz Ceramic should be just the ticket!
 
Re: Jazz ceramic = EMG 60 (Almost!)

If Jazz neck + ceramic 8 = like EMG 60,

then (if you got one lying around), tell me JB + ceramic = like ?

I was surprised myself when I tried the JB with ceramic and reminded me of a certain active, I'm beginning to come around now since my first backlash and contempt for its tone. In metal, it has its uses.
 
Re: Jazz ceramic = EMG 60 (Almost!)

For passive bridge pickups I only have the Custom-8 (started out as a Custom-5 and swapped), and a Distortion, so I can't comment on any JB mag swaps. I did put an A-8 in the DD though- didn't care for that anywhere near as much as the Custom-8. Also tried RCA5 in the DD, now that one sounded promising, probably real good for 80'ss/classic rock, but I was after something more metal. After messing around with those mag swaps in the DD, I decided it was at it's best in its stock ceramic form. But (no flaming please! :eek:), "I hear the JB and DD winds are very similar"!!! :doh:
 
Back
Top