Isn't an all maple guitar a Mother of all the Trebles Temple?
I'd use a much warmer pickup, A2 driven for example
Isn't an all maple guitar a Mother of all the Trebles Temple?
I'd use a much warmer pickup, A2 driven for example
I beg to differ. I don't find maple to have too much treble. There are times I find myself using a treble booster with my G&L. The misconception is that maple is bright. I find maple to sacrifice low mids for upper mids. That's where the confusion is.
If you want a bright wood, go play a poplar guitar like a EBMM Steve Morse signature.
my reference for the statement are my strats, both alder body, one with maple neck, the other with rosewood, the maple one is way brighetr, knocking on the body with the knuckles produces the same sound.
Then comes my G&L, mahogany with a maple top, compared to the SG, all mahogany, well, it's brighter.
So I guess an all maple guitar might be brighter.
I remember a friend of mine had an all maple guitar back in the 90s, I think with a JB, something coming from the 80s and I don't remember it as a good sounding guitar.
(BTW, how much does your G&L Superhawk weight?)
If you want a bright wood, go play a poplar guitar like a EBMM Steve Morse signature.