mudpuppy
New member
I've been spending a lot of time lately on the Warmoth website, which IMHO is just about like porn for guitar lovers. I was toying with the idea of building a thinline, because I like a semi-hollow sound and Warmoth seems to route a whole lot of wood out or their design.
Because I really like LP style controls, but want to retain the tele look, I was thinking that concentric pots would be a good option. I use the neck facing pots for neck pu volume and tone, while the bridge facing pots would be for the bridge pu. Standard 3-way tele switch. Has anyone tried this configuration, and how do you like concentrics in general?
Right now I'm leaning toward mahogany body w/ walnut top laminat. Little '59 bridge and vintage stack neck. Should be obvious that I like warmer tones with a little HB growl.
Instrument would be used for fairly clean blues and jazz.
Because I really like LP style controls, but want to retain the tele look, I was thinking that concentric pots would be a good option. I use the neck facing pots for neck pu volume and tone, while the bridge facing pots would be for the bridge pu. Standard 3-way tele switch. Has anyone tried this configuration, and how do you like concentrics in general?
Right now I'm leaning toward mahogany body w/ walnut top laminat. Little '59 bridge and vintage stack neck. Should be obvious that I like warmer tones with a little HB growl.
Instrument would be used for fairly clean blues and jazz.