Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

rguser

New member
Hi all,
Im considering my first semi hollow guitar but I don't want one with laminated wood. What choices do I have besides PRS hollobody models? Thanks,
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

You shouldn't treat semi-hollow electric guitars the same way you would treat an acoustic guitar. Typically, solid wood acoustic is better than a laminate acoustic. The same does not apply for semi-hollow electric guitars.

However, if a solid wood semi-hollow is a must I believe the Taylor electrics are as well as the thinline Telecasters.
 
Last edited:
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Also, early Reverend overseas ones had a chambered body with a spruce top
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Laminated sides and back are structurally better
The top should be solid bit if you get a flame, quilt, or burl then that's gonna be a Laminated ply on top

Won't hurt
Just that's why you don't see those type tops on acoustics

A semi hollow is kinda between

Laminates don't affect the magnetic pickups at all

And would have little to do with the amplified tone

*(Sent from my durned phone!)*
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Laminate helps defeat feedback on completely hollow guitars. Even the Gibson J-160E acoustic has a laminate for this reason, since it has a P-90 at the fretboard. If the guitar has a center block, then I believe then you're ok with solid. The key is, what are the laminate layers? For example, my Elitist Casino is 5-ply maple-birch-maple-birch-maple. The top of the line made like the vintage ones in the 1960's are 5-ply maple.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Gibson's been using laminated tops on hollow and semi-hollows since the 1950's. You don't think any of their guitars since then sound good?
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

I think the Gibson CS-336 isn't laminated, and the back & sides of the Carvin SH-550/575 aren't either. But the traditional sound of semi hollows is of laminated woods.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Gibson 335s sound good. But to my ears a side by side comparison with a PRS hollowbody favors the PRS by a world. So I assume its due to the difference between solid and laminates.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

The CS-336 is a much,much different guitar than the 335s.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

You quoted mincer saying 336 being different from 335. So is 336 closer to PRS hollowbody? If that's the case, then I will totally consider it.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

I think the Gibson Midtowns from a couple of years ago were solid top. They were a very good price as I recall, with a flat top.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

You quoted mincer saying 336 being different from 335. So is 336 closer to PRS hollowbody? If that's the case, then I will totally consider it.

It's carved out like the prs, but they are still going to be very different guitars for the reasons I stated above.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Mincer got it right--what you want is a Gibson CS-336 or a CS-356. The back and sides are from a slab of mahogany, and then a maple cap is laid over the top. They are closer in construction to a Les Paul than a 335. These are hard to find, and make sure you have deep pockets if you go looking for one. I think they used Classic '57s, though some of the Custom Shop models came with BB1&2s.

Come to think of it, there are several models of the Les Paul that are semi-hollow: the Supreme, the Elegant, Classic Antiques, some Classics and newer Standards. The Bantam and the Florentine have F-holes. The Cloud 9 series were done with Historic Reissue specs, but hollowed out. Many of these are real featherweights, and they sound great. The Guild Bluesbirds are another semi-hollow single-cutaway.

And there are some other Gibson versions of their archtops that came in thin models, like the George Gobel L-5 and the ES-350T, and I think these were all solid woods.

Fender has their Thinline Teles; I had an original '68-69 in ash and it was a great guitar. They have reissues of these, and the later '72 models have HB pickups. I think they even have versions with P-90s and one with Filtertrons. And there's always the Fender Custom Shop.

G&L can build you semi-hollow ASAT with or without F-holes, and they also offer their Strat-bodied guitars (S-500, Legacy, Comanche) in semi-hollow form with an F-hole. These are my favorites, and they are durned SEXY!

Schecter had a version of their C-1 Series that was an all solid wood semi-hollow, and a 12-string, too. I always thought these were really nice, but I would have upgraded the "Duncan-Designed" pickups.

Collings is another builder you might look at. Take a look at his City Limits Jazz model--instant drool!!! And if you're a Phish fan, I think Trey's Languedoc is built like that. Alembic is another one that comes to mind.

Lots of choices...

I will say that I played four PRS hollow-bodies a few years ago when I was first contemplating an ES-335. One had the deeper body and the spruce top; the others were thinner, with the maple tops. They are exquisitely built instruments, without a doubt. But even taking the money out of the equation, I still preferred the tone of the ES-335, for being woodier, warmer and more versatile than what I heard from the PRS offerings.

Bill
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

The Johnny A signature is also carved hollow from a single slab of mahogany. The top is two-piece maple, but I don't believe it's laminate. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) Quarter-sawn neck and longer 25 1/2" scale.
 
Re: Need advice: semi-hollow without laminate!

Rickenbacker 330 and 360 are non-laminate semi-hollows.
 
Back
Top