NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

UberMetalDood

New member
I was shopping for one of the new Gibson Les Paul Classic Plus models (they're basically the Traditionals with baked maple necks, different colors and options) when I came across this:

DSC_0144.jpg


I normally won't give any attention to Les Paul Studios because they're chambered and very light. They are great guitars, but not what I like in a Les Paul. People say that the Studios are just Les Paul standards without the binding and different pickups, but I have owned several standards and the studios don't have the same quality wood.

So I come across this amazing looking "Deluxe" about three months ago. I pulled it from the rack and it was heavy! Boy did it feel great, exactly like my Traditional. It had a whole different feel and sound than the other studio models. When I got home, I checked out Gibsons website and looked up some information on the Internet. It turns out, Gibson did these as an Exclusive Guitar Center deal.

These are basically Les Paul Traditionals (weight relieved) without binding, Burstbucker Pro bridge and 490R neck. Even though it doesn't have any binding, you can see the separation between the body and maple cap, so it's like natural binding.

I played this guitar every week while I kept saving $20 here, $10 there, and scraping change until I finally saved enough to get this one. I walked out of Guitar Center with it inside its hard shell case (same one that comes with Traditinals) for about $1160.

I am TOTALLY satisfied with this guitar. In fact, more so than any Les Paul I've bought before. I was able to get a fantastic quality, WEIGHT-RELIEVED, Les Paul with pickups that I don't have to change any time soon for a lot less than I would have to pay for the models I originally desired.

I'm not saying all of this because of the excitement from getting a new guitar because I've been playing this guitar every week for 3 months. All of the newness and excitement had passed. I knew it was only a matter of time before it was mine.

I'm not without complaints however. One thing that irritated me was the fact that they don't come with pick guards. Guitar Center sells them but they're $22 - and get this... you have to buy the little metal bracket separately for $11. I don't understand why they don't come with them since the cheapest Gibsons come with them, but I guess if it keeps the price reasonable then I'm not going to make any phone calls to Gibsons office.

I should also mention that I wasn't expecting much out of the Burstbucker Pro and 490R combo, but it turns out that they compliment each other pretty well. If you tried Burstbucker Pros before and didn't like them, it's a good chance you were playing a chambered Les Paul. They sound MUCH better in a more solid piece of wood. Even though the pickups are pretty good, I have plans to install a Seth Lover set.

Oh, did I mention these have push/pull coil taps built into the volume knobs? Yeah. They're pretty cool. Even though they don't sound much like single coils when you tap them, they do give you a nice range of different tones.

This was such an incredible deal that I'm going to sacrifice two of my Stratocasters to trade-in for another one of a different color. Well, enough talk. Let me show you a few pictures...

DSC_0138.jpg


DSC_0143.jpg


DSC_0152.jpg


DSC_0155.jpg


DSC_0144.jpg
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

I think I love the back of it more that I do the front. Congratulations!!
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

First upgrades

Pickups: Seth Lovers

Tuners: Locking Grovers

Bridge: Locking Tonepros



Any suggestions?
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Very nice indeed, even from the back.

I dont understand putting locking Grovers on it though, when it has Grovers already.
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Guy at work was toying with the idea of getting a "real" LP instead of the Epiphone LP he has. Even though he upgraded the stock pups to SD 59s, he just couldn't get exactly what he was listening for. I brought in my Gibson for him to try and a week later he ordered a new LP Standard.

Said the difference is night and day, he even said he doesn't think he wants to swap out the BB3/57 combo it has, also with coil taps. I know the Gibson purists like to complain about all the "impurities" that Gibson is building into their Lesters nowadays, but I think what they are building now it great. The standard he got even came with the locking grovers and locking bridge/tailpiece. Im seriously thinking about getting one of the Classic Customs. Don't mean to hijack, but just had to say my piece.

I just think that Gibson still does good work, and that nice-looking slab of tone you got there proves it. Nice fiddle Uber!
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Aww...i was expecting minis.

Congrats on the NGD though:)
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

First upgrades

Pickups: Seth Lovers

Tuners: Locking Grovers

Bridge: Locking Tonepros

Any suggestions?

Pickups: Seth Lovers - No arguments here but to get the best out of these you'll want

Pots: Bourns - The stock pots in LPs seem to be very poor. You can't turn down the volume without mud.

Caps: paper in oil

Tuners: Something light. I think LPs breathe better in the lower registers with a light headstock. Locking Grovers are very heavy.

Bridge/Tailpiece: Something that's not cast zinc alloy. Aluminum tailpieces make quite an agreeable difference. With that experience under my belt, I'm determined to use a better bridge, too. the TonePros bridge does sound pretty good but I'm looking at this machined steel beast of awesomeness.
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Very nice indeed, even from the back.

I dont understand putting locking Grovers on it though, when it has Grovers already.

Maybe it's because the guitar is new and the tuners haven't had time to break in, but I don't like the way they adjust. It's like you have to turn them a little bit before they start to tune. I can never quite get the perfect tuning like I can with the vintage tuners on my LP Traditional. I used to have a 2010 LP Standard that came with locking tuners and they worked great.

Guy at work was toying with the idea of getting a "real" LP instead of the Epiphone LP he has. Even though he upgraded the stock pups to SD 59s, he just couldn't get exactly what he was listening for. I brought in my Gibson for him to try and a week later he ordered a new LP Standard.

Said the difference is night and day, he even said he doesn't think he wants to swap out the BB3/57 combo it has, also with coil taps. I know the Gibson purists like to complain about all the "impurities" that Gibson is building into their Lesters nowadays, but I think what they are building now it great. The standard he got even came with the locking grovers and locking bridge/tailpiece. Im seriously thinking about getting one of the Classic Customs. Don't mean to hijack, but just had to say my piece.

I just think that Gibson still does good work, and that nice-looking slab of tone you got there proves it. Nice fiddle Uber!

I think Gibson makes incredible guitars. I love them and hope to own many Les Pauls one day. They seem to be doing the right thing now. They are making the guitars with excellent quality and many more affordable models.

Pickups: Seth Lovers - No arguments here but to get the best out of these you'll want

Pots: Bourns - The stock pots in LPs seem to be very poor. You can't turn down the volume without mud.

Caps: paper in oil

Tuners: Something light. I think LPs breathe better in the lower registers with a light headstock. Locking Grovers are very heavy.

Bridge/Tailpiece: Something that's not cast zinc alloy. Aluminum tailpieces make quite an agreeable difference. With that experience under my belt, I'm determined to use a better bridge, too. the TonePros bridge does sound pretty good but I'm looking at this machined steel beast of awesomeness.

I didn't know the pots make much difference. I'm going to have to check those out. What do you mean about paper in oil?
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Congrats man! That's a great looking axe. I as at GC last night tooling around with a few guitars and played a silverburst studio and a traditonal pro. I like them both, sound very good and resonant acoustically and felt really nice. I kind of liked the 60s neck on the traditional pro better, but the binding looked weird and kind of pink in the light. (The guitar was black)
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

Congrats man! That's a great looking axe. I as at GC last night tooling around with a few guitars and played a silverburst studio and a traditonal pro. I like them both, sound very good and resonant acoustically and felt really nice. I kind of liked the 60s neck on the traditional pro better, but the binding looked weird and kind of pink in the light. (The guitar was black)

The neck on my deluxe feels exactly the same as my LP trad pro. In fact, everything except the binding, pickups and tuners are exactlly like my trad pro. There are 50's studio deluxes too. Maybe you got hold of one of those. I really like them too. They have those thick necks, a little heavier, and have a sweet honey burst finish.
 
Re: NGD & Review: Gibson Les Paul Deluxe 2012

I didn't know the pots make much difference. I'm going to have to check those out. What do you mean about paper in oil?

I went and looked that guitar up and it looks like they come with 500k CTS pots all round so it might actually be ok stock.

Capacitors can be made many ways. One way is to use a ceramic composite material, one way is to use a metal film rolled up with a dielectric sandwiched between it. Most guitars have little chicklet-shaped ceramic caps. I think film caps sound more nicer in guitars.

Film caps can have many different dielectrics: oil-soaked paper, mylar film, poly film, etc.

I hope any of that makes more than not-sense because I took too long a Sunday-afternoon nap and my head is filled with something that has a low neuron density.
 
Back
Top