Observations about the Stratocaster

JeffB

Let it B
So, I’ve been playing a Strat now and enjoying the piss out of it for over a month. While this is certainly not my first strat or strat type as many of you know, it’s the only one I’ve been able to really bond with since my Deluxe Strat Plus circa 1993.

Due to my somewhat recently diagnosed CTS, I’ve had to change my practice habits, physical playing style, and previous preferences in a guitar over the past 7 months or so. The guitars and specs I used to swear by (namely flatter radii, high neck angled, large fretted Gibson scale instruments) aggravate my CTS to the point where I cannot play without extreme discomfort. Neck angle and taller frets in particular kill me.

The Strat however, with its rounder radius, lack of neck/string angle, wider spacing, longer scale length, smallish flat backed /wide neck, and medium-ish size frets has become surprisingly comfortable when in years past they always felt very “alien” to me. Always loved strats, but just could not get along with them.

As a mostly long time Gibbo/Hamer/Dean, etc player (23 or 24 years), I thought I’d give my observations after settling into this very different style of guitar on how they differ at least to me.

Probably the biggest difference I’m reminded of is how more touch sensitive a strat, (even with a bucker) is. Quite simply you have to play a strat with more forcefulness. It makes you work harder - and lets you know when you aren’t up to snuff. VERY apparent in the picking hand. The wider spacing and increased tension does not tolerate “slop” or laziness whatsoever. You will learn to be more efficient in the picking hand or you might as well give up.

This touch sensitive nature also makes for more expressive playing, even under pretty high gain. It responds better to things like Vibrato, bends, shaking chords, etc. More “vocal”, if you will.

Conversely, I feel the strat and its wider spacing/longer scale frees up the fretting hand. It simply is more tolerant of fretting technique. This is where the shorter Gibson scales and narrow spacing will eat you alive if you are lacking precision in your fretting hand. Not that a Strat is completely tolerant, just noticeably more-so: You’ve got more wiggle-room (literally and figuratively) between strings and frets.

Tonally, the Strat naturally lacks the aggressive nature of a Gibson style instrument. There is a certain amount of “power” or “balls” that is inherent in the design of the Gibson styles, whereas the strat requires you to supply the aggression via pups and/or playing style. I don’t feel this is a wood type issue, but simply design. The Stat is more pristine and a clean slate to work off of tonally-whereas the Gibson is pre-disposed to a certain amount of “raunchiness”.

Technically the strat is more stable on a day to day basis once it is set-up properly and the strings are broken in, etc. However, when a Strat does “go out” due to humidity or temp fluctuations, it REALLY goes out to the point of not being very playable at all and requires a bit more time and care to bring things back to where they were.

Of course, YMMV and all that. But thats just my experience having not played a Strat for any significant amount of time and getting used to one again. Please feel free to discuss :bigthumb:
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

I agree with you man --- except I'll say that my Strat experience (1996 American Standard) always delivers unbelievable tuning stability. I could throw my Strat down the stairs and not need to tune.

Their build quality is second to none, also. I have dropped it on its neck, cantilevered it on it's headstock, hammered nails with it, and it doesn't hurt the guitar. I frequently throw it onto the nearby chair when I'm done playing it in the living room, but I would never do that with my Gibson (+Epiphone) guitars. If they took a bad bounce, the Fender would go through the wall and the Gibson would explode into toothpicks :laughing:

Stratocaster necks are too thin to play for a long time (for this guy) --- I take (giant-necked) Gibs to practice, and perform with the Strat.

Turning the knobs on a Strat is not as rewarding as turning the knobs on a Gibson, the Strat sounds pretty much "Treble" or "cocked wah" but not a lot in the middle.

Tuning a Strat down a half-step for reduced tension is a great move for those who are fighting the Strat
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

I've noticed lots of those things too but haven't been able to phrase it as eloquently as you did...thanks for the post man.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

Good observations. I agree with a lot of them except for the "go out" part. If it's a "cheap", meaning, POS, then yeah, it'll go out like crazy. If it's a higher end Strat (MIA, MIA Deluxe, some of the MIM's, Custom Shop), they'll hold it together VERY well with minimal adjustments needed.

When I had a Gibson Les Paul in the 90's and most recently the Epi LP, they constantly needed attention when the seasons changed. Not so much with the Strats. Very little needed there. *Maybe* a small truss rod tweak, but that's it.

Strats fit me like an old shoe. My first electric was a cheap Strat copy and I just stuck with them. I'll pick up other odd-shaped guitars and whatnot, but when I pick up a Strat, it feels right to me.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

Very good observations. I can't really add much to that description. Does a fine job of summing up the differences, the strengths, and weaknesses.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

Unless you have a sloppy bridge or crap tuners, any tuning problems are 99% in the nut. Either it's not cut right for your string gauge (or at all) or it's not properly lubricated. Amazing how guitars with a history of tuning instability suddenly become very stable when you get the nut right.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

I agree with what Jeff says about a Strat (or Tele) being more expressive. There is something about low output singlecoils that really brings out a player's touch.


I have noticed that a lot (not all) of players who play Gibson humbucker equipped guitars early in their career switch to Fender type singlecoil equipped guitars as they mature as musicians.

One other thing...every Fender I have owned has sounded different and almost all of the Gibbies I have played were very similar tone-wise.....YMMV on that one.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

I love them both, but LP or 335 is still the flagship axe for me. You just have to get some righteous buckers in them and they'll be every bit as expressive as any single coil, but such buckers can be a little hard to find.

But your scenario is still partly true. I didn't like single coils at all when I was just starting, but got a Strat when I was 18 that charmed me with all that articulate cluck and chime. So then I just had no use for P90's, til I got to play some kind of goldtop LP with P90's in it and I discovered that P90's can often be as fat and sweet as a humbucker, or at least pretty close.

The Tele was the last hold-out for me on guitars to not like, primarily because of the looks (I still think they're dorky), and secondarily because I figured that it was basically a Strat without a middle pu. Then when I was starting out making pu's, I started getting a LOT of requests for Tele pu's so it was clear I had to get one for a testbed. A Squier for $150 with lousy frets but a surprisingly sweet tone. Still have it and needlessly to say I quickly learned that a Tele is a very different animal from a Strat.

Now I love them all, but the LP or 355 will still be the one in the coffin with me.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

Folks, I'm not saying one style is better than the other, and please do not misinterperate it that way, otherwise I will have to :smash: a few of you :laugh2:

These are simply my observations of how a strat differs for someone coming off playing Gibson-style guitars to near-exclusivity for many years. In particular how they differ from a "required technique" standpoint.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

Folks, I'm not saying one style is better than the other, and please do not misinterperate it that way, otherwise I will have to :smash: a few of you :laugh2:

These are simply my observations of how a strat differs for someone coming off playing Gibson-style guitars to near-exclusivity for many years. In particular how they differ from a "required technique" standpoint.

It all boils down to personal preference.
 
Re: Observations about the Stratocaster

I just rediscovered Strats, too, and I certainly agree that they let you hear in much more detail what you are actually doing. I am not quite sure that's a good thing :). The Les Pauls react more to left-hand "after-touch" manipulation of the string, namely the violin style vibrato.

I don't like the thin necks either and seriously consider getting a V neck at least to try it out and ditch it later.
 
Back
Top