My tried'n'true mag combos are the following:
1. The "Vintage Whisperer™" : A3 neck/UOA5 bridge
2. The "All'rounder™" : A4 neck/A8 bridge
3. The "Smooth Vintage Whisperer™" : A3 neck/A2 bridge
And as tradition teach us, OUA5/UOA5, A2/A2 and A4/A4 are excellent choices in all PAF-type winds.
A4 neck
A8 bridge.
Or, just get 59b and a PGn and call it a day.
The PG tightens up the low end and give the top end a little more bite compared to a 59n. I like the bigger bottom of the 59b myself for the bridge slot. If i need to tame the top a little I just go with 250k or 300k pots for that spot.
I know the "common knowledge" is that the 59b is thin and/or bright. I say it just isn't so when you are talking about a Les Paul.
Is that Alnico 9 or nine magnets?
You've given me an idea. Slice up several magnets into little squares. Different Alnico formulation under each string.
So would a set of pearlys be a better starting point than the 59s?
Maybe. I have all 5 of Duncan's PAF types, and even with mag swaps couldn't get my PG's (in an LP Std) sounding the way I wanted, and ended up selling them. In stock form, the neck is pretty warm and mellow, and the bridge is brighter than you'd think with it having an A2. But other people here like their PG's.
I didn't see where you said what kind of music you're playing, but if you want to go the PAF route, Seth's are the best-sounding Duncan PAF; which Seymour co-designed with Seth Lover, the guy who invented humbuckers for Gibson in the 1950's. It's as authentic as you can get. I think it's safe to say that there's very few players who have had both Seth's and PG's, and prefer PG's over Seth's.
Is that Alnico 9 or nine magnets?
You've given me an idea. Slice up several magnets into little squares. Different Alnico formulation under each string.
I think it's safe to say that there's few players who have had both Seth's and PG's, and prefer PG's over Seth's.