P-rail/Full Shred review

timhatimay

New member
Hi Everyone,

I have a long overdue review of the pickups I put into my guitar. Since, everyone here was nice enough to advise me on my selection, I've been meaning to do a thorough review. The pickups are the P-Rails in the neck and the Full Shred (FS) in the bridge.

The P-Rail:

I started with the PR in the traditional/intended orientation. I loved all of the sounds, but the difference in tone between each of the modes was very subtle. The rail was not a great single coil sound on its own either. I ended up switching it so the rail is closest to the neck. It made a drastic change in the rail sound. I feel the P90 may have lost a bit of its bite, but it may just be in my head. I think the parallel sound was improved in this orientation as well. I did lose some "quack" when combining the singles as well (will talk about below).

Now i find the rail to have a great single coil sound. Not quite as chimey and bright as a strat of course, but its unmistakably single. The notes are well defined and it is quite bright. Its pretty good for imitating Fender style tones, and I really enjoy the rail coil by itself. Parallel mode sounds closer to the rail, but combines some of the characteristics and tones of the series HB and P90. Its has a great midrange sound, and it very warm and full. It really does remind me of a vintage PU. I've probably spent more time on this mode than any other. Its pretty defined, and has some major bite. It does get a little boomy, and can be somewhat muddy. However, I think this adds to the vintage flavor. This mode is very nice clean as well, and depending on my right hand can be smooth and clean or a little raw and distorted. It seems to share this aspect of the P90 in that it can really respond to the picking and be smooth or a powerhouse. The P90 mode is great. I've never really played any P90's before, and they are really cool. Its got the good characteristics of a single, stays articulate, but is seriously rude. Its darker with a lot of mids, but the highs still sing and lows stay defined. I have to spend some more time with the P90, but I think this will become my favorite Mode. The series mode was surprising as well. I didn't expect to really like it, but its a great compliment to my FS bridge. Its nice and creamy with a nice low end. It seems a bit scooped with the mids not as present, and with focus mostly on the bass. I find it really fun for smooth leads and also some crunchy rhythms. The output is pretty high though, so its not great for most cleans (my amp has very little headroom keep in mind).

Full Shred:

This is what seemed to be the most highly recommended in my previous thread, and is the pickup I was leaning towards as well. I have to say that the forum members must know what they are talking about, because it is just what I was looking for. In series mode its has a great eq and character. The mids are the dominant part which I like for this type of pup. It still maintains some singing and searing highs (but not screeching and uncomfortable). The bass is slightly less intense, but has excellent definition. The pickup is very articulate, and will show flaws in playing, but I really like its tone. So far seems great for classic metal, heavier rock, new style metal, and most aggressive style music. It seems to be my ideal bridge pickup. Also, the other modes are quite useable as well. The bridge single by itself is very bright and even twangy. Its been useful as a mock tele so far; sounds like a really bright single. The neck single is similar in sound, but more tame. It works well for a bridge style single, without being as harsh. The parallel mode is nice too. I picture this like the SD Jazz pup (even though I've never played it). Its very bright with great articulation, but is lower output and cleans up nicely. The differences between configurations is more subtle on the FS, but each has some places where it excels.
 
Re: P-rail/Full Shred review

The combinations:

I was a little nervous about how the two pickups would interact. There are a bunch of combinations, but I'll only mention the few that I really enjoy. I think being they share the same magnets, and have similar output they can work well together. First is both pups in series. It seems to take the character and tone from each. Its nice an creamy with good bass, but maintains great treble and lots of clarity over the entire range. Its like the best of both worlds, and can change depending on how you are playing as well. Its a great combo, and they mesh together really well. Next, is the quack! Its no sultans of swing quack, but it is still a great sound. I can get a nice strat sound and is pretty convincing (even though the guitars are totally different except some shared hardware). I really dig this sound, and it can be modified slightly depending on which FS coil is selected. Also, using the P90 with the neck side FS single gives a little quack as well. Its certainly not traditional, but its a great sound. Its a little beefier and bolder, but still has the nasal characteristic. Also, using any P-rail combination with the series FS is a good sound. It is dominated by the FS, but can add some different flavor.

Overall:

I'm very pleased with the PU selection. It is very versatile, and has a lot of great tones. I'm not looking to exactly emulate a specific other instrument, but you can get really close to a lot of different styles. Can be vintage or modern, thin or full, articulate or muddy, bassy or treble or middy, or a lot of combinations of these. Most days I can't put my guitar down, because I'm looking for new songs to play or just messing around.

The Guitar:

The guitar is a Squier Super-Sonic. The guitar fits me like a glove, and is special to me, so I was really happy to further improve its tone and playability. It started as a simple pickup swap, and turned into much more. I knew I wanted triple shots for the versatility. I replaced the vintage tuners with Gotoh vintage locking tuners. They are the rock-solid versions, with adjustable posts, and the lubricating finish...they are expensive, but so far are excellent! No wrap of string to detune, very easy to string, and I eliminated one of my trees. I also added a wilkinson VSVG trem in place of the stock vintage style fender unit. It feels much better (and beefier) than the stock unit. It seemed to make a noticeable improvement in the acoustic, and thus overall tone of the guitar. I love the adjustments and locking intonation as well. I shielded the guitar as per "Quieting the Beast." Also, all of the electronics were upgraded (CTS Pots, USA toggle, etc.). Last but not least I changed the pickguard to a translucent black model. I'm really happy with the outcome as you can see the internals, but its not junky. The guitar is a 24" scale, basswood body, bolt-on maple neck with rosewood fingerboard. It also has a reverse slanted bridge pickup and reverse headstock. I've waited so that I could do a little more detailed review and play a bit more. I was also waiting for some of these parts so I could do a full build.

Ancillary Equipment:

These results were primarily obtained through a Marshall Class 5 with no effects. I also played a bit through a little fender portable amp and a Peavey transfex pro 2x12 just for fun. Occasionally I used Twin Tube classic pedal for distortion, but at lower volumes it seems to cover up some of the tonal differences so I'll mostly omit these observations.

An Aside:

In my previous thread many had recommended the demon, and i was so compelled that I knew I had to try it. I ended up just installing the demon tonight into my fender jag-stang (another crazy fender frankenstein!) along with a fender texas special in the neck. So far I like it. Its certainly a different animal than the FS and I'm glad I put the FS in my super-sonic, but I think its going to go very nicely with the texas special in the jag-stang and can give some nice vintage style tones, but slightly more aggressive.

Anyways, sorry for the long thread, but I hope its thorough for anyone considering a similar combination. Any questions, just let me know. Thanks for all of your help in making my selection.

Thanks!

Tim
 
Re: P-rail/Full Shred review

I'm still really enjoying these pickups. I plan to add phase switching to the P-rail, and I may do a bass cut (i.e. strangle switch) or treble cut on the other push-pull pot. I would recommend that everyone who tries P-rail, tries them in both orientations, because you do get a different tones (especially in the different modes). One thing about the FS I didn't mention before is its natural character. I find that it is much more natural sounding than the other ceramic PU i've used. I really like this quality. It may lose some of the high end (and sizzly top), but gives the guitar a good natural sounding tone...anyways, still can't put this axe down.

Thanks for looking,

Tim

Wow I really make long post(s)! Some eye candy:
 
Back
Top