Re: Pups for SG
the guy who invented fire said:
+1, IMO you have to ba careful with pickups for an SG...they tend to be thin, and SG's are one place I do not suggest Alnico II pickups usally.
I'm probably a good case in point. This week I replaced my 490r/t combo with some Seths. Although the Seth neck is a vast improvement over the 490r, that's not the case with the bridge.
In this guitar, an SG Special, the Seth sounds thin, even harsh at times, in the bridge. The problem is that the bridge humbucker sits almost a half inch closer to the bridge, compared to Les Pauls, super strats, etc. The Special has an advantage in this area over some SG models. Because it uses a pickguard instead of rings, the pickup is parallel to the body, and therefore angled to the strings, putting the bridge side poles farther from the strings, which tames some of the treble.
So, the Seth is coming out, and the 490t is going back in (besides being thicker, I miss it's slight nasal honk). I could tell that the Seth would sound killer in a guitar where the bridge pickup is further from the bridge, but to me, it doesn't work in an SG. Interestingly, the 490s are Alnico 2 pickups, but are wound hotter in the Seths. Too hot for the neck, but hot enough in the bridge to make up for the unusual positioning.
BTW: here are the resistance readings I got:
490t: 8.27
490r: 8.0
Sethb: 8.0
Sethn: 7.42