B bluesky636 New member Aug 28, 2025 #41 Masta' C said: That's the thing...if you're already happy with 1006 in the neck, then there's really no need to change. :beerchug: Click to expand... True dat.
Masta' C said: That's the thing...if you're already happy with 1006 in the neck, then there's really no need to change. :beerchug: Click to expand... True dat.
jeremy LoveMachineologist Staff member Aug 28, 2025 #42 im thinking of trying 1022 in the neck and 1006 in the bridge on a set of antiquities i have, curious what i i will find
im thinking of trying 1022 in the neck and 1006 in the bridge on a set of antiquities i have, curious what i i will find
B bluesky636 New member Aug 28, 2025 #43 jeremy said: im thinking of trying 1022 in the neck and 1006 in the bridge on a set of antiquities i have, curious what i i will find Click to expand... Keep in mind that the majority of impact due to differing levels of carbon content will be in the high frequencies and high frequency harmonics.
jeremy said: im thinking of trying 1022 in the neck and 1006 in the bridge on a set of antiquities i have, curious what i i will find Click to expand... Keep in mind that the majority of impact due to differing levels of carbon content will be in the high frequencies and high frequency harmonics.
jeremy LoveMachineologist Staff member Aug 28, 2025 #44 yes, precisely why i would put high carbon in the neck and low in the bridge
B bluesky636 New member Aug 28, 2025 #45 jeremy said: yes, precisely why i would put high carbon in the neck and low in the bridge Click to expand... Let us know how it goes.
jeremy said: yes, precisely why i would put high carbon in the neck and low in the bridge Click to expand... Let us know how it goes.