Did somebody say "boobs"?
Hadn't noticed them before. Have no experience with them. Reminds me of the Randall module amps from a decade or more back, which reminds me of the Seymour Duncan convertible from a decade or more before that. Seems like a great idea, if they sound accurate. I do notice these module amp ideas don't seem to take off, for some reason.
If you are on The Gear Page there is a huge thread in the Rack Subforum on them.
I’m interested but the $900 point of entry for a single module and $1600 for a dual module is a bit steep for me to try out.
If you are on The Gear Page there is a huge thread in the Rack Subforum on them.
I’m interested but the $900 point of entry for a single module and $1600 for a dual module is a bit steep for me to try out.
As beau pointed out above, this concept rears its head every decade. Everyone says they sound great, but then they fizzle out.
My opinion is that the power amp and speakers make as much or more difference to the overall experience, so swapping out 1K preamp modules is not much more than changing EQ. Preamps sound suprisingly similar when played through the same power amp and speakers and can be made to sound like the other with EQ.
As beau pointed out above, this concept rears its head every decade. Everyone says they sound great, but then they fizzle out.
My opinion is that the power amp and speakers make as much or more difference to the overall experience, so swapping out 1K preamp modules is not much more than changing EQ. Preamps sound suprisingly similar when played through the same power amp and speakers and can be made to sound like the other with EQ.
I guess some of the cost is in developing the new circuits/ layouts, the casings for the modules, etc. Rather than using a traditional amp chassis and shell.
Still too high for me to consider.