Kommerzbassist
Thunderbirdologist
Which one do you think is commonly of better quality and why?
thanks
thanks
Jeff_H said:You can get more options from Warmoth. Wood options, routing options, custom options, ect. In the end it will not be cheaper than Fender, but IMO better quality.
The finish is what will cost you, especially if you want nitro. If you want a poly, like on many of the Am Standard guitars, then you can get a solid color alder or ash body finished by Warmoth cheaper than Fender...for the body itself. By the time you add a neck with finish, hardware and pickups/electronics, it's hard to build for less than a basic Am Standard, but again, it will be of better quality, IMO. Plus it's fun to design and help put together your own guitar....that is priceless.
Kommerzbassist said:What's so special about nitro fnsihes? Why are they so expensive? I mean they don't last as long as polys and take fewer to get off...
Jeff_H said:It's all a matter of personal preference really, but the general feeling is that a nitro finish allows the wood of the guitar to resonate and "breathe", thus allowing the tone of the wood to become more a part of the sound. Much like the finish on an acoustic guitar, or on a violin or other such instrument. It also ages nicely, which is part of it's charm to those who like it. All of the original Gibson's and Fenders, actually all guitars of that age, were finished in nitro, so it's traditional.
Poly is most definately more durable, but my opinion is that nitro is superior tonally. YMMV.
Erlend_G said:Yup, i like Nitro the best too. A clear nitro finish over ash, is SO beautiful, especially when it starts to age.... :32:
Also, i don't like the idea of having your guitar plastic coated with polyester..... :smack:
Quencho092 said:does oil top nitro tone wise? I think it should since it's just a stain.