jcthejester13
member
e- 9
B- 10
G- 12
D- x
A- x
E- x
Thanks in advance.
B- 10
G- 12
D- x
A- x
E- x
Thanks in advance.
omfg i have it completely backwards... What i meant was:
E- 12
b- 10
g- 9
d- x
a- x
e- x
my point is that we have NO CLUE without more notes. It could be anything
IDK, Marc ..... I'm seeing it as a B major.
Finger an an open D chord. Then, instead of playing the F# on the (skinny) E string play the A on the 5th fret (an octave above the A note on the G string).
Now move this form up the neck to the position jc suggests, and I think it becomes a B major chord.
5/1/5
??? E is the major 4 of B...so it can't be a Bmaj...it would actually be an Amaj without the 3 so A5![]()
![]()
technically its not a chord. chords need 3 different notes to be defined while this has only 2 . an E octave and an A .
Technically it is a chord because the definition of a chord is something which consists of at least two musical nots in it...... I Believe, but could be wrong
horses for courses. I always thought diads wernet considered chords. but it doesnt matter . its all about context anyway .
I concur with the Esus4 . when its got 3 notes and 2 are an e octave I would go with the octave as the root.
Of course if the bass player, or anyonme else , is playing another note underneath then it changes everything and it could be anything