Re: What neck humbuckers sound best wired parallel?
Ahh. Typically, high output isn't an option for me, especially in the neck position, so I should have asked a more specific question.
What vintage to medium output pickups sound best in the neck position?
I agree with Mincer : IME and IMHO, low and mid output HB's don't tend to be convincing in parallel. This wiring risks to make their sound too weak and trebly.
It was obvious when I've connected once a Duncan PG to a series/parallel switch, decades ago. I had to undo the mod because it was useless to the ears of the owner...
Technical reasons: when a HB is wired in parallel, the inductance and DCR of the coils are divided by four (roughly: I'm not taking in account mutual inductance).
As soon as the overall inductance of the pickup is above 5 or 6H, parallel wiring becomes much more useable... But a low/mid P.A.F. or T-Top replica typically measures +/- 4H :-/ [EDIT: for a bridge PG, overall inductance = 4.6H]
Now, it's possible to wire such pickups in parallel
with an external inductor hidden somewhere in the guitar. If this inductor is beefy enough, the benefits of parallel wiring will remain.
I've done that once with a bridge Jackson J50BC (9.2k, 5.27H): it sounded too harsh in parallel. I've paired it with a HB (11k, 4.5H) deprived of its baseplate and magnet, then buried in the electronic cavity. Once the J50BC in parallel with this hidden "dead" humbucker, the overall DCR and inductance are roughly those of a single coil (5k, 2.4H). It sounds accordingly (and much better in this case than the pickup itself in parallel).
FWIW.
NOTE - Not sayin'
this or
that low/mid output HB "can't" sound good in parallel: tone is subjective and the most "theoretically heretic" wiring
can always sound gorgeous with a given pickup in a given guitar.
