muttonchopsrule
New member
right now i'm using sm57's but i don't really like how it colors the tone. i'm finding it difficult to get a nice thick sound regardless of mic placement... there's always too much midrange/high mids and not enough low end chunk.
my band does all our recording ourselves, and our setup is as follows: a yamaha 16 channel board (which isn't really needed to record guitars) into an m-box (soon to be a 002) running protools 6.9 on a dual G5 mac.
i've been looking and the audix D3, and although i've never used one i'm wondering how it would compare, especially with how flat the frequency response is compared to the 57.
i have a budget of around $150, and i'm not opposed to buying used. should i look around for a completely different mic, or should i try a decent condenser mic used in conjunction with the 57? or should i just double-track everything? i'm pretty much open to any suggestions, and would like to hear everyone's favorite way to capture their tone when recording.
ps
sorry if this is a topic that's been beat to death...i'm still sort of discovering this part of the forum.
my band does all our recording ourselves, and our setup is as follows: a yamaha 16 channel board (which isn't really needed to record guitars) into an m-box (soon to be a 002) running protools 6.9 on a dual G5 mac.
i've been looking and the audix D3, and although i've never used one i'm wondering how it would compare, especially with how flat the frequency response is compared to the 57.
i have a budget of around $150, and i'm not opposed to buying used. should i look around for a completely different mic, or should i try a decent condenser mic used in conjunction with the 57? or should i just double-track everything? i'm pretty much open to any suggestions, and would like to hear everyone's favorite way to capture their tone when recording.
ps
sorry if this is a topic that's been beat to death...i'm still sort of discovering this part of the forum.
Last edited: