RogerMexiko
New member
Is there some different criteria used in measuring tube and SS amps? Or is my 20W amp just broken?
Watts are like horsepower in cars. In the 60's horsepower was real. The record 0-60 time had been 2.9 seconds, made by a 1961 Pontiac Catalina 2+2, until the Bugatti Veyron came through with 2.5 seconds. So in a 2 ton car with supposedly 300 to 400hp, you did 2.9, and in a 3500 lb car with 1000hp you do 2.5. Something is wrong there.
So in the 60's when the Rolling Stones played stadiums, and Bill Wyman had a 200Watt bass amp that filled the venue, and today they have 15000-30000 watt SS PA systems to do the same thing, you just have to question the actual meaning of Watts between then and now
Just FYI, a 1961 aluminum bodied Catalina 2+2 with an experimental 421 motor did do 2.9 seconds, with a Powerglide transmission, which is the closest you can get to a constant force, (almost no wheelspin), trans. The 421 option for regular people was added in 1962, without aluminum body panels. Still a 421 has less torque than a 16 cylinder 488 ci motor, just based on cubic inches and rotating mass, and I was wrong about the weight of the Veyron, and probably low on the weight of the Pontiac?... PLUS the Pontiac was on 1961 tires!, which is a whole nother story. Please pardon my senility... But that's neither here or there, as the rest of the info is right on.
I like the RMS vs peak comment, that's probably the original guy's answer.
Respectfully submitted,
If tube amps are significantly louder, watt to watt, why isn't there a uniform measurement of loudness?
- SiIsn't that dB?
If tube amps are significantly louder, watt to watt, why isn't there a uniform measurement of loudness?
As you alluded to, the basic circuit has been the same since the days of Marconi.whats with transformer technology, it doesn't seem to have advanced in 75 years?
WOW! Thanks gang for all the interesting, informative and even the stuff I have no idea what it means. I'll walk away from here with my own conclusion - tube amps are louder than SS amps rated at the same watts. This is part real and part perception but for me bottom line they are louder and sound a heck of a lot better. Too bad they weigh so darn much. whats with transformer technology, it doesn't seem to have advanced in 75 years?
It takes 2X the power to make 3dB difference, which is considered a barely perceptible audible difference.
Also, the majority of information in this thread reaches a much different consensus - that generalizations about the loudness between tube amps and solid state amps are inaccurate in most cases, as an amps loudness is a much larger combination of factors than just the type of circuitry used. Even with the same wattage - which still isn't a great indicator of loudness. I can run a 20 watt tube amp in class A (less efficient) through a 1x8 cabinet with a speaker that has an efficiency of 90 dB while cutting upper mid frequencies, and put it up against a 20 watt solid state amp in class AB (more efficient) through a 4x12 cabinet with each speaker having an efficiency of 102 dB while boosting upper mid frequencies. I can guarantee you the solid state amp in this scenario will stomp all over the tube amp in volume (and it'd possibly sound better too). That's why it's plain inaccurate to claim one is louder than the other regardless of equal wattage.