VintageToneGuy
New member
Just curious!
I always thought it was to try and squeeze a little more treble and brightness out of the bridge pick up.
There isn't much string energy that close to the bridge and the bass side is slanted forward to increase the bass response...
I always thought it was to try and squeeze a little more treble and brightness out of the bridge pick up.
+1. That was at least part of the motivation, along with cosmetics. But time has shown that the last thing a Strat bridge PU needs is the extra treble and reduced energy from the slant. The low string also suffers from it, with 'strat-itis." Had the bridge PU been vertical, or slanted the opposite direction (ala Hendrix) it would be used much more than it is. Most of the local Strat players I know don't use their bridge single coil at all, and essentially have a two PU guitar. It has the unmistakable signs of a design flaw (every manufacturer has a few).
actually the bridge pickup is straight. It's the rest of the guitar that's at an angle.
I thought "the oher way round".
I thought Leo wanted to get the bass poles further away from the bridge to get some sort of warm'ish feel from the bridge.
I thought "the oher way round".
I thought Leo wanted to get the bass poles further away from the bridge to get some sort of warm'ish feel from the bridge.
Actually the bridge pickup is straight. It's the rest of the guitar that's at an angle.