Yet another "new" switch.

Not bad, not bad at all. Yet, the Schaller M-switch is even smaller, so why go for this instead of the schaller?
 
orpheo said:
Not bad, not bad at all. Yet, the Schaller M-switch is even smaller, so why go for this instead of the schaller?
Click to expand...

It's a fine point, but the Schaller contacts are under a cover. You need to use their diagrams. This one allows you (me) to figure it out.

That probably wasn't a good argument. :p
 
yea I needed a shorter one not a thinner one a while back

the m-switch looked good but was half the price of the guitar

dang it
 
That's a nice looking switch. I like the quality of that brand. The only megaswitch I have an used is Type E from Stewmac. Works fine and I was able to get the switching options I wanted. I have to say, I've never had a Oak-Grigsby lever switch fail.
 
ArtieToo said:
It's a fine point, but the Schaller contacts are under a cover. You need to use their diagrams. This one allows you (me) to figure it out.

That probably wasn't a good argument. :p
Click to expand...

No, the M switch is also a 4 pole switch that allows you the exact same wirings as this one.

076cfdb701aea797d6abe0f67a0bd698.jpg
 
That looks great. But as was said, the height is the main problem with superswitches not the width. Also, at $23 I'm not inclined to use it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top