banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

    Which do you prefer and why?

    What are the tonal advantages of one over the other?

    Do you prefer something in-between?

    Thanks!
    If I know I'm going crazy, I must not be insane.

    Originally posted by TheLivingDead
    DON'TGETMADBRO

  • #2
    Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

    If I had to choose, I'd go open 9 times out of 10.

    But what I have is in-between and, imo, pretty much perfect.
    ---------------------------
    The most popular thread I've ever made was 1) a joke and 2) based around literally the most inane/mundane question I could think of. That says something about me, or all of you, or both.

    https://forum.seymourduncan.com/show...or-for-a-Strat

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

      For clean tones I Love an open back combo cabinet...The sound comes out the front and back and seems to fill more musical space...

      For gained tones,normally the closed back projects better,keeps things tighter,lows are tighter,upfront...As a compromise I prefer an open back cab.
      Amps: 66 Fender BF Pro Reverb Combo,1973 50 Watt Marshall Head,Marshall 4x12 A/V Cab,Vox ToneLab LE,Vox VTH Valvetronix 120 Head,Vox AD 2x12 Cab,Roland Cube 20X

      Guitars: Several Stratocasters,2 Fender Telecasters,Gibson SG Standard,Tokai Love Rock Les Paul,Dean Acoustic.

      Pickups: SD SSL2,SSL5,Twangbanger,Antiquity Surfers,59N,Seth Lover N/B,Dimarzio Fred,Dimarzio VPAF N,Fender Fat 50s,Fralin SP43 Bridge,Brobucker,Antiquity Texas Hot.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

        I was mixing, with the bottom 1x12 cab closed and the top 1x12 open. But I found the open top cab was taking away from hearing the more immediate punch of the bottom cab, and it was creating less than desirable tones spreading into the room from the back (not always, just depending on which room I was in), so I closed the top as well and now it just crushes. And it still fills the room fine because the bottom cab is angled 1.5 inches and the top 2 inches. Of course, a drummer probably wouldn't hear it as well.

        And I used to like my open back deville and hellhound before I chopped them, but now I think I prefer all closed back, at least with my current setup, because it still feels open enough to me, unlike the the tight and compressed results from a marshall jtm45 with 4x12 cab that was parked in my basement for awhile. Not sure why that setup sounded more closed in, but it did great as well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

          In an open cab, you hear the front impulse of the speaker then the rear impulse out the back. Sound dissipates thru the room.

          Closed back, when the speaker cone compresses to push against air in the cab, this builds potential energy and affects the tone forcing it to push harder out the front.

          Ported cabs like mine have a slot on the bottom so when the speaker pushes to the back of the cab, it squeezes the soundwave out the slot directed forward instead of backward. IMO it's best of both worlds but some might not like it for guitar. I recommend that everybody try a good ported cab with tweeter at some point as it is a very 'airy' focused, room filling tone that excels at any venue.
          2004 50th Anniversary Deluxe American Strat, SETH-N BRIDGE, ANT 2 SURFER MIDDLE, ANT 2 DLX MINI HUM NECK

          280K RS guitarworks volume pot, 250k cts tone pots, .047uf paper in oil Jensen aluminum capacitor, running D'addario Chromes 13's with wound g > Analogman Orange Juicer>Acoustic 200H Bass head> Alesis Picoverb> unknown 12'' JBL Orange car speaker

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

            Like both....

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

              Agree with Quencho92. Totally depends on what space I'm trying to fill. Open = ambiguous, possibly putting sound in places I don't want or need it to be. Also can contribute to phase cancelling in various parts of the air. This is neither good nor bad, just a byproduct. Closed = direct, puts the sound where I want it, more focused, less bleed to other parts of the room.

              One criticism I have with open backed cab users is that in small venues they don't always walk around the room while playing (or having someone else play) to survey how their guitar sounds around the entire venue. It sounds great from where they're standing, but sounds "bar band" and unprofessional elsewhere. By the same token, it is possible to use a closed back cabinet poorly too, blasting the skin off of a few unfortunate audience members. Both have the potential for getting lost in the mix in places in the room, but I find it's easier to get stuck with unintended negative consequences with an open cab. Small ports and anything around a 75% closed back are usually pretty safe too.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

                Indeed, and whatever 'boominess' from a ported cab can be dialed out in the EQ. I frequently mess with 60hz to add or subtract air, it only really adds audible bass to the first 5 frets of E string, everywhere else it just 'exhales' the notes which I like. Imitates 4x12 sounds.
                2004 50th Anniversary Deluxe American Strat, SETH-N BRIDGE, ANT 2 SURFER MIDDLE, ANT 2 DLX MINI HUM NECK

                280K RS guitarworks volume pot, 250k cts tone pots, .047uf paper in oil Jensen aluminum capacitor, running D'addario Chromes 13's with wound g > Analogman Orange Juicer>Acoustic 200H Bass head> Alesis Picoverb> unknown 12'' JBL Orange car speaker

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

                  While we're at it, don't forget baffle size, which matters for both open and closed back. Not saying larger is better than smaller (more a matter of taste), but, for open back, I've found by direct comparison using the same amp and speaker that a larger baffle is smoother and more open, with less of a mids oriented sound. This is consisent with baffle research I'd done at the time.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Open back cabs vs. Closed back cabs

                    I like both. Open-backs spread the sound better, closed-backs are much more focused. With different EQ, both can work for all styles, especially when there is a mic in front of them.
                    Wackor
                    Ørdøg
                    NecroPolo
                    Diabolus in Musica
                    SIDrip Alliance
                    Book of Shadows
                    RKH

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X