Re: Is owning LP's a sickness?
Earth to Andrew, no one's 'dissing' or 'disregarding' Fender here. You''ve got a rambling defense for something that wasn't attacked. What I said didn't question Fender's contribution to musical history. How did you manage to come up with that? How about turning down the rhetoric and holding a normal conversation. You act like this is life and death. We're just guys talking, it's all opinions on everyone's part, and you get yourself all worked up. Chill out.
Gibson has chosen, all the way back to the 1950's, to make many distinctly different models of LP's, to reach as many players, and budgets, as possible. Maybe it was a good marketing move, maybe it wasn't. LP's may have the most legitimate variations of any guitar, who knows? Which would be why (in an attempt again to get back on topic) LP's would be particularly collectible to some people, and could be diagnosed as a 'sickness' like the OP suggested.
Originally posted by Andrew Lamprecht
View Post
![](https://forum.seymourduncan.com/core/images/smilies/Eyecrazy.gif)
Gibson has chosen, all the way back to the 1950's, to make many distinctly different models of LP's, to reach as many players, and budgets, as possible. Maybe it was a good marketing move, maybe it wasn't. LP's may have the most legitimate variations of any guitar, who knows? Which would be why (in an attempt again to get back on topic) LP's would be particularly collectible to some people, and could be diagnosed as a 'sickness' like the OP suggested.
Comment