At first I was think kinda hokey, but sounds kinda groovy..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
Collapse
X
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
Varitone and a killswitch?
Last edited by Agileguy_101; 11-22-2011, 07:22 PM.Custom neck-thru strat
1989 MIJ 1962 RI Strat
1995 PRS CE24
D'avanzo #8
Breedlove Solo Concert
1996 USA Dean Baby Z
1991 40th Anniversary Les Paul
1968 Fender Bassman, Egnater SW45, Mesa Mark IIB Coliseum, Mesa ElectraDyne 1x12 Combo, Avatar 4x12, Mesa half back 4x12 Earcandy 2x12
Roland RE-201 Space Echo, 70's Fender Reverb Unit
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
I love the Wilshire. I've got two, and am considering putting a Varitone in one of them. I've got no need for a killswitch, though.Originally Posted by IanBallard
Rule of thumb... the more pot you have, the better your tone.
Comment
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
It's cool but I am not sure I want that headstock on it. I love the batwingMy Bands -
https://kamikazechoir.hearnow.com/
www.instagram.com/kamikazechoir
www.reverbnation.com/theheartlessdevils
Just some fun guitar stuff from time to time
GUITAR KULTURE
Comment
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
Originally posted by Wattage View PostIt's cool but I am not sure I want that headstock on it. I love the batwingOriginally posted by dominusYour rant would sound better with an A8 magnet, it'll beef it up some without sacrificing some of the whine.
Comment
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
Originally posted by GuitarDoc View PostBatwing = classic.
Yes it is the coolest looking headstock- but because it's so long and because it's pitched back- it's a real weak spot on the guitar. I can imagine Epiphone wanting to do the 3x3 headstock just to cut down the number of breaks- regardless of how cool the batwing is.
I've got a 65 Olympic- snapped the headstock, had it repaired- the repair guy built a volute on the back- it's not exactly pretty or all that comfortable, but it's stable.
The other issue with the batwing is that it's a long way from the nut to the farthest tuners- with no string tree or anything to keep the strings from vibrating- so you'll get a lot of sympathetic vibrations- I just use a velcro cable tie to damp it.
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*
Originally posted by Slash2987Oh c'mon man, quit being such a liberal and actually accept someone disagrees with you.Originally posted by PVFanI'm a good sex man.Originally posted by GrumpyI am just jug the merlot.
Comment
-
Re: wilshire phant o matic? more wilshire love?
Originally posted by The Golden Boy View PostBatwing = Break
Yes it is the coolest looking headstock- but because it's so long and because it's pitched back- it's a real weak spot on the guitar. I can imagine Epiphone wanting to do the 3x3 headstock just to cut down the number of breaks- regardless of how cool the batwing is.
I've got a 65 Olympic- snapped the headstock, had it repaired- the repair guy built a volute on the back- it's not exactly pretty or all that comfortable, but it's stable.
The other issue with the batwing is that it's a long way from the nut to the farthest tuners- with no string tree or anything to keep the strings from vibrating- so you'll get a lot of sympathetic vibrations- I just use a velcro cable tie to damp it.
I am super careful of bumping any part of any of my guitars. I'm really not concerned at all about head breaks. I also don't get any noticeable or objectionable vibrations from the strings near the tuners, so that is also not a concern for me. If it was, I would simply put a tree or two up there.
But I do love the looks or the batwing more than the traditional Epi head.Originally Posted by IanBallard
Rule of thumb... the more pot you have, the better your tone.
Comment
Comment