Re: Maple neck for my project
I have no clue why they want 641 anyway, probably for more tremolo range? Ive got a perfectly intonated parts strat with screws at 644 mm from the nut, Fender/Fender-style 6 screw trems have some saddle range after all
Mine has like 5mm more to spare on the 6th string if you cut the saddle springs (might have to use short screws? Not sure), 640 should be doable then
Depends on your choice of saddles though I guess, I'm running oldskool bent ones
As a last resort, there's also THIS wacky approach, which will give you a whole bunch of adjustment range to spare:
![](http://www.tdpri.com/telephoto/data/500/Strele.jpg)
(Image not mine, shamelessly stolen from telecaster people's forum)
I have no clue why they want 641 anyway, probably for more tremolo range? Ive got a perfectly intonated parts strat with screws at 644 mm from the nut, Fender/Fender-style 6 screw trems have some saddle range after all
Mine has like 5mm more to spare on the 6th string if you cut the saddle springs (might have to use short screws? Not sure), 640 should be doable then
Depends on your choice of saddles though I guess, I'm running oldskool bent ones
As a last resort, there's also THIS wacky approach, which will give you a whole bunch of adjustment range to spare:
![](http://www.tdpri.com/telephoto/data/500/Strele.jpg)
(Image not mine, shamelessly stolen from telecaster people's forum)
Comment