I haven't read the article, but here's a piece on how they came up with the flamethrower guitar guy: https://guitar.com/features/guitar-o...max-fury-road/
My drivel below:
So the Mad Max franchise is one of my favorite things. Partial to Mel over Tom so far (sorry not sorry). Tom had a better movie, bigger budget, and better technology, but Mel is Max just like Harrison Ford is Indiana Jones.
After Max creator George Miller passes, I imagine the franchise will come to be like James Bond, with fans having their favorite Max actors, as well as endless debates over what is and is not canon considering the loose continuity of both franchises (for example, the death of Bond's wife from George Lazenby's On Her Majesty's Secret Service is referenced in Pierce Brosnan's The World is Not Enough, I believe).
I was pretty impressed with Fury Road, which functioned as a stand alone reboot even though, if you follow the comics, it is a direct sequel to the Mel Gibson movies (the Interceptor appears again after Road Warrior because Max rebuilds it after Thunderdome in the comics, after which the War Boys capture it and it becomes the Razor Cola, only to be destroyed again by Furiosa in Fury Road).
I consider Fury Road a very loose Road Warrior remake with Furiosa being more of a Max character than Max himself, whereas Max himself remains as something of a bystander or surrogate for the audience. I would have preferred something focusing more tightly on Max himself like the first film, but I don't think we'll see a 1970s style exploitation film like that again from the franchise. Just car chases.
Max is also a product of late 70s/80s Australia, and I prefer to see the films stuck in that time frame. It doesn't make sense to see smartphones and Toyota Corollas in Mad Max even if the world is starved for gasoline and car chases in gas hog V8 cars make no sense.
Depending upon how much you see Miller as being influenced by the works of Joseph Campbell, Max is probably going to pop in and out of these movies as kind of a folk hero with little attention paid to age, past injuries, and other things that cause plot inconveniences. (For example, in Road Warrior he is blind in one eye from the Interceptor crash and retains a dilated pupil in Thunderdome, only for this to be disregarded in Fury Road. His knee injury from the first film also doesn't seem to give him much trouble by the Fury Road final fight as he jumps from vehicle to vehicle.)
Considering Miller was an emergency medicine doctor before he was a filmmaker, Max's realistic injuries (as well as people with various visually striking medical problems like gout and dwarfism) are one of the hallmarks of the franchise.
With that said, I don't really like this "whatever works for the plot" approach. What makes the Max character interesting to me over the Clint Eastwood Man With No Name character is Max's fragility and tendency to survive situations by dumb luck, not skill. Outside of a car, he is actually rather ordinary. This is reinforced by Furiosa's besting him at various points in Fury Road. His skill is humorously implied, though, when he destroys a bunch of bad guys off screen with no real explanation as to how. At the same time, Max's beat down of the huge Nathan Jones in Fury Road seems out of character for Max, though, who is 5'8-5'10" at best.
I'm not sure how they're going to put Max into Furiosa considering it will probably be 10-20 years before Fury Road, but if Miller sticks with Campbellian conventions it won't really matter. I am guessing it will be a cameo at best. I'd just prefer a little more concrete continuity.
The open endedness of the franchise does make for some very rich and interesting fan fiction, though, going as far as Max having a cameo in Fallout: New Vegas.
I'm hopeful the upcoming Furiosa will be a good film, but I don't think it will be much of a Max film. Mad Max: The Wasteland is due out as well, but considering Miller is in his 80s I am concerned that he will not be able to finish it, especially with his physical, hands on style of directing car chases with practical stunts and effects instead of CGI.
On Campbell's influence on Miller's storytelling: https://jcf.org/notes/george-miller-...max-fury-road/
Didn't mean to go off on a rambling tangent, but I dig the films. I don't go to conventions or anything, but I enjoy continuity and plot speculation, especially considering the striking visual nature of the films and their tendency to drop in small Easter eggs when least expected.
Thanks for reading.
My drivel below:
So the Mad Max franchise is one of my favorite things. Partial to Mel over Tom so far (sorry not sorry). Tom had a better movie, bigger budget, and better technology, but Mel is Max just like Harrison Ford is Indiana Jones.
After Max creator George Miller passes, I imagine the franchise will come to be like James Bond, with fans having their favorite Max actors, as well as endless debates over what is and is not canon considering the loose continuity of both franchises (for example, the death of Bond's wife from George Lazenby's On Her Majesty's Secret Service is referenced in Pierce Brosnan's The World is Not Enough, I believe).
I was pretty impressed with Fury Road, which functioned as a stand alone reboot even though, if you follow the comics, it is a direct sequel to the Mel Gibson movies (the Interceptor appears again after Road Warrior because Max rebuilds it after Thunderdome in the comics, after which the War Boys capture it and it becomes the Razor Cola, only to be destroyed again by Furiosa in Fury Road).
I consider Fury Road a very loose Road Warrior remake with Furiosa being more of a Max character than Max himself, whereas Max himself remains as something of a bystander or surrogate for the audience. I would have preferred something focusing more tightly on Max himself like the first film, but I don't think we'll see a 1970s style exploitation film like that again from the franchise. Just car chases.
Max is also a product of late 70s/80s Australia, and I prefer to see the films stuck in that time frame. It doesn't make sense to see smartphones and Toyota Corollas in Mad Max even if the world is starved for gasoline and car chases in gas hog V8 cars make no sense.
Depending upon how much you see Miller as being influenced by the works of Joseph Campbell, Max is probably going to pop in and out of these movies as kind of a folk hero with little attention paid to age, past injuries, and other things that cause plot inconveniences. (For example, in Road Warrior he is blind in one eye from the Interceptor crash and retains a dilated pupil in Thunderdome, only for this to be disregarded in Fury Road. His knee injury from the first film also doesn't seem to give him much trouble by the Fury Road final fight as he jumps from vehicle to vehicle.)
Considering Miller was an emergency medicine doctor before he was a filmmaker, Max's realistic injuries (as well as people with various visually striking medical problems like gout and dwarfism) are one of the hallmarks of the franchise.
With that said, I don't really like this "whatever works for the plot" approach. What makes the Max character interesting to me over the Clint Eastwood Man With No Name character is Max's fragility and tendency to survive situations by dumb luck, not skill. Outside of a car, he is actually rather ordinary. This is reinforced by Furiosa's besting him at various points in Fury Road. His skill is humorously implied, though, when he destroys a bunch of bad guys off screen with no real explanation as to how. At the same time, Max's beat down of the huge Nathan Jones in Fury Road seems out of character for Max, though, who is 5'8-5'10" at best.
I'm not sure how they're going to put Max into Furiosa considering it will probably be 10-20 years before Fury Road, but if Miller sticks with Campbellian conventions it won't really matter. I am guessing it will be a cameo at best. I'd just prefer a little more concrete continuity.
The open endedness of the franchise does make for some very rich and interesting fan fiction, though, going as far as Max having a cameo in Fallout: New Vegas.
I'm hopeful the upcoming Furiosa will be a good film, but I don't think it will be much of a Max film. Mad Max: The Wasteland is due out as well, but considering Miller is in his 80s I am concerned that he will not be able to finish it, especially with his physical, hands on style of directing car chases with practical stunts and effects instead of CGI.
On Campbell's influence on Miller's storytelling: https://jcf.org/notes/george-miller-...max-fury-road/
Didn't mean to go off on a rambling tangent, but I dig the films. I don't go to conventions or anything, but I enjoy continuity and plot speculation, especially considering the striking visual nature of the films and their tendency to drop in small Easter eggs when least expected.
Thanks for reading.
Comment