Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interesting new Michael Kelly Patriot. (Dual JB's)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostIt's interesting that they went with dual JB's. A JB in the neck seems odd. But then again, maybe not.
https://www.michaelkellyguitars.com/...eid=2d88f61676
- Likes 1
-
jb in the neck isnt new, but its an interesting choice. i had a rhoads with jb neck and distortion bridge. sounded really good for hard rock and metal, but cleans were ok at best. the middle position was better than neck or bridge for that. the neck was great for fat solos and the distortion does what it does.
hamer used an odd combo on a few guitars with a sh5 custom neck and sh11 cc in the bridge, but again it worked surprisingly well. albeit clean tones not as pristine as i prefer, and the middle was the best choice for that again
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by jeremy View Postjb in the neck isnt new, but its an interesting choice. i had a rhoads with jb neck and distortion bridge. sounded really good for hard rock and metal, but cleans were ok at best. the middle position was better than neck or bridge for that. the neck was great for fat solos and the distortion does what it does.
hamer used an odd combo on a few guitars with a sh5 custom neck and sh11 cc in the bridge, but again it worked surprisingly well. albeit clean tones not as pristine as i prefer, and the middle was the best choice for that again
I've had success with a Custom 5 in the neck and Custom in the bridge, both with Triple Shots. Very versatile.
I have not yet tried a CC but if it does not work in the bridge I will try it in the neck as I tend to like A2s there over A5s.
Comment
-
Maybe they ordered a whole crate of them and had to get rid of them? I think the JB in the neck has happened quite a bit on this forum, but less so in production guitars. It wouldn't be my choice at all, but some people really do dig it.Administrator of the SDUGF
Comment
-
It wouldn't be something I'd have considered. Sounds muddy as a neck humbucker, but surprisingly OK in the mid + bridge position. Pretty nice when split on the neck too.Join me in the fight against muscular atrophy!
Originally posted by Douglas AdamsThis planet has - or rather had - a problem, which was this: most of the people living on it were unhappy for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movements of small green pieces of paper, which is odd because on the whole it wasn't the small green pieces of paper that were unhappy.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I dig everything except the paint color choice -wrong hue of blue fading into that shade of white with a black headstock -not awful, but just not as good as it could be IMO
But really cool guitar -no idea what a JB sounds like in the neck“For me, when everything goes wrong – that’s when adventure starts.” Yvonne Chouinard
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by esandes View Post
JB mushy? listen to rust in peace. rhythym and lead all JB for the whole album. all bridge too AFAIK from the tone.
Yes, mushy. They probably rolled off the lows in post with a hi pass filter to some degree.
Fairly sure they also used boosted Marshalls, which are not so much a modern amp for extreme metal vs. Mesa, Peavey, Diezel, Engl, Bogner, etc.
Also I've found the JB mushy in my personal experience. I go for EMG 81s in 24 volts, Blackouts, Full Shreds, and Parallel Axis pickups instead of the JB.
Modern metal is also 16ths at 200+ bpm, sometimes to 240, far in excess of 80s-early 90s thrash metal of the period.
The JB is a fine rock pickup at moderate tempos in the bridge, but I have other things I would use first, even the Duncan Custom line.
You can make up pickup deficiencies later in your signal chain. I happen to like the EMG HZs that many people consider anemic. But I compensate by adjusting the preamp as necessary.
Comment
Comment