Tweet
Friends,
All of these guitars were played at low volume about 3, clean with a Blues Deluxe, treble on 7, mids on 4, bass 2. I tried the A5, A4, OUA5. All in a Seth in each guitar (bridge). The A5 was Quite sharp, focused on the bottom and a little harsh on the high end. The A4 seemed a little less harsh on the high end, but otherwise may have had a little less focus on the low end-W/ more mids, but is is very, very close. *To me*
The UOA5 sounded almost as if I had a slight bit of gain on it. I know what someone meant when they said "bloom". These might all be different at a louder "band" volume, but here at home this is what I heard. So as of now, I prefer the A4 and A5 to the UOA5. There was a considerable difference to my ears from the UOA5 compared to the others. it seemed just a tad "softer and fuzzier" all over the spectrum. Again, slightly, but there. That was a surprise. I got these from addiction FX so I have to assume they marked the magnet correctly, but mistakes can happen.
SJ
All of these guitars were played at low volume about 3, clean with a Blues Deluxe, treble on 7, mids on 4, bass 2. I tried the A5, A4, OUA5. All in a Seth in each guitar (bridge). The A5 was Quite sharp, focused on the bottom and a little harsh on the high end. The A4 seemed a little less harsh on the high end, but otherwise may have had a little less focus on the low end-W/ more mids, but is is very, very close. *To me*
The UOA5 sounded almost as if I had a slight bit of gain on it. I know what someone meant when they said "bloom". These might all be different at a louder "band" volume, but here at home this is what I heard. So as of now, I prefer the A4 and A5 to the UOA5. There was a considerable difference to my ears from the UOA5 compared to the others. it seemed just a tad "softer and fuzzier" all over the spectrum. Again, slightly, but there. That was a surprise. I got these from addiction FX so I have to assume they marked the magnet correctly, but mistakes can happen.
SJ
Comment