banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Parralell / split question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Parralell / split question

    Hi folks. Just curious. Is parralell switching a good alternative to coil splitting for a hot bridge humbucker in an HSS style strat? Also wondering how this applies to a minibucker (sceamin' deamon or a JB jr) in the neck.

  • #2
    Re: Parralell / split question

    I think the single coil sized humbuckers always sound better in parallel than split. For full size humbucker, I prefer split.
    Administrator of the SDUGF

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Parralell / split question

      Thanks bro. Appreciate the advise. I'm running a 5 way with 1 vol/1 tone. Would I use 500k for the pots?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Parralell / split question

        Originally posted by Mincer View Post
        I think the single coil sized humbuckers always sound better in parallel than split. For full size humbucker, I prefer split.
        I can't speak to all small humbuckers, but I'll pile on with this piece of anecdata:

        For a while my Strat just had a neck single-coil and a bridge Hot Rails, with no middle pickup. At first, because it was easiest, I had the single-coil and the two coils of the Hot Rails wired up to the 5-way switch just like three single-coils would have been, so I had

        1 neck
        2 neck + north blade (parallel, obviously)
        3 north blade
        4 north blade + south blade in parallel
        5 south blade

        Later I changed the wiring so it was in series, but that original 4th position both-coils-in-parallel always sounded better to me than either coil by itself or with the coils in series.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Parralell / split question

          I generally like the tone of parallel much better than split.

          Just for your info...the "Jr" humbuckers which are single-coil sized are not "mini humbuckers" at all. True minis are totally different animals.
          Originally Posted by IanBallard
          Rule of thumb... the more pot you have, the better your tone.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Parralell / split question

            Rob option. Partial split is my favorite. Because it's not so low in volume and it sounds single coily but with some skank from the partial coil.
            The things that you wanted
            I bought them for you

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Parralell / split question

              Originally posted by Clint 55 View Post
              Rob option. Partial split is my favorite. Because it's not so low in volume and it sounds single coily but with some skank from the partial coil.
              Amen to that, but most production model 'buckers don't give you that option. Do you know a technique for doing it as a mod in a reasonably straightforward manner?
              Gibson LP, Burstbucker 3 A6, 490R A4
              Gibson LP, Pearly Gates A6, Sentient A4
              Gibson LP BFG, Burstbucker A8, P90
              Gibson SG special T, GFS Crunchy Mini, Gibson mini A3
              Strat SSS, SD STK-6 , SSL1 middle, Bootstrap Sparkle Neck
              Strat HSS hardtail, Perpetual Burn A6, Bootstrap Sparkle mid/neck
              Tele, DMZ Area Hot T, Gibson Mini A3
              Tele, DMZ Pegasus A2, Gibson Mini A3
              Jackson V, SD Pegasus bridge, 490R A5
              PRS SE CU24: Air Norton A2, 490R A3

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Parralell / split question

                If you don't want hum, go with parallel.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Parralell / split question

                  Originally posted by zizyphus View Post
                  Amen to that, but most production model 'buckers don't give you that option. Do you know a technique for doing it as a mod in a reasonably straightforward manner?
                  Huh. All you do is wire a resistor between the series connection and ground. 4k is single coiley, 6k is fat, and 10k is about half split.
                  The things that you wanted
                  I bought them for you

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Parralell / split question

                    Originally posted by Clint 55 View Post
                    Huh. All you do is wire a resistor between the series connection and ground. 4k is single coiley, 6k is fat, and 10k is about half split.
                    Wow... I feel like an idiot. That's so simple and obvious...

                    Between your words of wisdom and my copious quarantine time, I'm about to bust out my soldering iron and rewire all my toys. Thanks!
                    Gibson LP, Burstbucker 3 A6, 490R A4
                    Gibson LP, Pearly Gates A6, Sentient A4
                    Gibson LP BFG, Burstbucker A8, P90
                    Gibson SG special T, GFS Crunchy Mini, Gibson mini A3
                    Strat SSS, SD STK-6 , SSL1 middle, Bootstrap Sparkle Neck
                    Strat HSS hardtail, Perpetual Burn A6, Bootstrap Sparkle mid/neck
                    Tele, DMZ Area Hot T, Gibson Mini A3
                    Tele, DMZ Pegasus A2, Gibson Mini A3
                    Jackson V, SD Pegasus bridge, 490R A5
                    PRS SE CU24: Air Norton A2, 490R A3

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Parralell / split question

                      Woohoo!
                      The things that you wanted
                      I bought them for you

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Parralell / split question

                        I refuse to live with hum. I would go parallel.

                        Now here is the deal: When you split the coil, you cut the inductance by one half. When you put it in parallel, you cut it down to only 1/4.

                        So, if the pickup is high output with lots of windings and high resistance (and therefore high inductance), parallel works very well. The single-coil sized humbuckers that are wired in parallel - the duckbuckers and vintage rails - sound better up close to the strings.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Parralell / split question

                          Or you could do the "Spin-a-split" mod. Dial in just as much of one coil as you like, you're not bound by the value of any resister.
                          Originally Posted by IanBallard
                          Rule of thumb... the more pot you have, the better your tone.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Parralell / split question

                            Here is info about the Spin-a-split mod. It certainly attempts to solve the issues some have with straight splitting.
                            Administrator of the SDUGF

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Parralell / split question

                              Wow, thanks for the spin-a-split info, guys.

                              You'd still want to use a logarithmic-taper pot for this, right? Because it's basically just a volume control for one of the coils?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X