Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is this schematic functional?
Collapse
X
-
Not yet. But I will today for sure. I still haven't got my PM's worked out in this new forum. I was trying to remember where this thread was. Later today, for sure. Thanks for your patience.
-
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostRe: Is this schematic functional?
Sorry man. I got swamped with customer stuff. I will get this done in the next day or two. Projects are stacking up.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Sorry man. I got swamped with customer stuff. I will get this done in the next day or two. Projects are stacking up.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Artie, did you manage to make the schematics?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Sweet. I'll PM you for a couple other questions.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostCool. I'll draw it up with that. Hopefully, before the day is over.
As for the guitar, I don't even care if it's an arched top. It could also be flat top and back. Unless that would totally kill its acoustic properties. But I'd be using it electric exclusively.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Cool. I'll draw it up with that. Hopefully, before the day is over.
As for the guitar, I don't even care if it's an arched top. It could also be flat top and back. Unless that would totally kill its acoustic properties. But I'd be using it electric exclusively.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
that's the translation for the switch!
Yeah that's very doable. It can be a full hollowbody or with a block in the middle. It's just that the body is carved out instead of bent sides.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by orpheo View PostI can translate the Super to a Mega in a pinch, no worries. I kinda 'have' to use the Schaller mega; i have still 20 laying around and I have a super tiny switch cavity.
As for my PM, picture this:
The wiring would look like this:
The guitar is just an example. Basically, the semi-hollow "look", with no controls, for a super clean look. If it was a quasi-semi-hollow, as you were talking about, that would be cool. All my electronics would be external.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostI'll draw you up both. One way that does what you showed first, but redone in a way that I think makes more sense. Also, (and I hate to cost you money), but it will be with a standard Superswitch. Even I have a hard time translating those Megaswitches to other than their stock configuration. (But I will look at the Megaswitch to see if I can adapt it.)
Then two, I'll do the 4-way, with pp's.
On a sidenote, could we maybe double up on this thread, and continue our PM discussion here, since I can't post a pic in a PM? I figure it shouldn't hurt since you're the OP.
I can translate the Super to a Mega in a pinch, no worries. I kinda 'have' to use the Schaller mega; i have still 20 laying around and I have a super tiny switch cavity.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by orpheo View PostUnfortunately, I agree. I would preferably use a 4 way blade (bridge, parallel both, series both, neck) and a push pull pot for phase and a push pull pot for split. Would love to see how you design this
Then two, I'll do the 4-way, with pp's.
On a sidenote, could we maybe double up on this thread, and continue our PM discussion here, since I can't post a pic in a PM? I figure it shouldn't hurt since you're the OP.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostLet me chew on this, after I get some java in me. It's the dual vol/tone that makes it tricky.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by orpheo View PostAllright, thanks. So, if I understand you correctly, if I turn down the neck volume or bridge volume in position 4, I should be able to cut the signal like normal? For some reason, I still don't get that thin, honkky out of phase tone I want.
I'll try this again on a new model soon. I have contemplated a 4 way, but what I want is:
* individual volume/tone pots per humbucker
* blade switch to select the pickups
* coilsplits
* out of phase
* series (both humbuckers in series, because the both in series split out of phase sounds GREAT: tried it with a slightly different wiring on another guitar and I wanted that tone again, but with individual volumes).
If someone can make me that, thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Is this schematic functional?
Originally posted by ArtieToo View PostNope. It's definitely OOP. I just double checked it. But it is difficult to trace through.
Yup. In series or parallel, both volumes remain in the path. Not ideal, but it should function.
I'll try this again on a new model soon. I have contemplated a 4 way, but what I want is:
* individual volume/tone pots per humbucker
* blade switch to select the pickups
* coilsplits
* out of phase
* series (both humbuckers in series, because the both in series split out of phase sounds GREAT: tried it with a slightly different wiring on another guitar and I wanted that tone again, but with individual volumes).
If someone can make me that, thanks!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: